Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29454378›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Do employees benefit from collaborations between out of hours general practitioners and emergency departments?

Elisabeth Sybilla Johanna van Gils-van Rooij, Sjoerd Michael Broekman, Dingenus Herman de Bakker, Berthold Rudy Meijboom, Christoffel Joris Yzermans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth Sybilla Johanna van Gils-van RooijScientific Centre for Care and Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. l.vanrooij@spoedpost.nu.
Sjoerd Michael BroekmanThe Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dingenus Herman de BakkerScientific Centre for Care and Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Berthold Rudy MeijboomScientific Centre for Care and Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Christoffel Joris YzermansThe Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (NL) 8271.1009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an attempt to redirect patients who are inappropriately attending hospital emergency departments (ED) and in doing so provide the right care at the right place, out-of-hours GP (General Practitioner) services and EDs increasingly collaborate in Urgent Care Collaborations (UCCs). Work satisfaction is an important factor in analysing the impact of this organisational change. The objective of this study is, firstly, to discover if there is a difference in the employee experiences between those working in UCCs and those in traditional out-of-hours services in which EDs and out-of-hours GP services operate separately (i.e. "usual care"). Secondly, we would like to identify which factors affect employees' experiences in these settings.

methodsThis study followed a cross-sectional study design, comparing usual care with UCCs. Data regarding employee experiences were collected from physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, medical assistants and front desk personnel, by means of a questionnaire with scales regarding quality, workload and co-operation between the out-of-hours GP service and ED. Independent samples t-tests were used to determine mean differences between the settings. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to test which items affected the perceived quality, workload and co-operation.

resultsThe results showed that mutual co-operation alone was perceived as significantly better in UCCs compared to usual care. If divided between employers, no differences were found in the employee experiences working in out-of-hours GP services. ED employees in UCCs experienced a significantly better co-operation with their GP colleagues than their peers in the usual care setting, but also a higher workload. Remarkably, ED employees were less satisfied in general. The multiple regression model showed that perceived quality, workload and co-operation were interrelated. Co-operation was the only aspect that was rated higher in the UCC setting.

conclusionWhile perceived quality is equal and co-operation between out-of-hours GP service and ED is better, the objective and perceived ED workload was higher in UCCs compared to usual care. Though UCCs relieve the pressure on EDs concerning the number of patients, they seem to aggravate the workload. EDs need to be careful not to excessively adjust staff capacity when responding to lower numbers of patients.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareCooperative BehaviorEmergency Service, HospitalGeneral PractitionersInterprofessional RelationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareSocial BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID29454378
PMCPMC5816359
OpenAlexW2792283893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.