ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
StructRNAfinder: an automated pipeline and web server for RNA families prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved taxonomic and gene sampling advance the knowledge of deep relationships within Macrodasyida (Gastrotricha).Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2026Article
- TZ1391: a computationally designed circular mRNA multi-epitope vaccine candidate against Mycobacterium tuberculosis via TLR3 immunomodulation.BMC immunology · 2026Article
- Genomic structure of yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus): genome organization, evolution, gene family expansion, metabolites and protein synthesis.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative and systems analyses of Leishmania spp. non-coding RNAs through developmental stages.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Proposal ofISME communications · 2025Article
- Article
- "ISME communications · 2024Article
- Comparative Genomic Analysis of VirulentMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Functional diversity of nanohaloarchaea within xylan-degrading consortia.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- RNAsmc: A integrated tool for comparing RNA secondary structure and evaluating allosteric effects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- The Genome of the Marine AlgaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Posttranscriptional Regulation in Response to Different Environmental Stresses in Campylobacter jejuni.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- The core and accessory Hfq interactomes across Pseudomonas aeruginosa lineages.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Genome Sequencing and Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative Genomics of Typical and AtypicalMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- FindNonCoding: rapid and simple detection of non-coding RNAs in genomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing and Annotation of the YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Satellite-Like W-Elements: Repetitive, Transcribed, and Putative Mobile Genetic Factors with Potential Roles for Biology and Evolution of Schistosoma mansoni.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Nanopore sequencing and de novo assembly of a misidentified Camelpox vaccine reveals putative epigenetic modifications and alternate protein signal peptides.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- FGGA-lnc: automatic gene ontology annotation of lncRNA sequences based on secondary structures.Interface focus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe function of many noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) depend upon their secondary structures. Over the last decades, several methodologies have been developed to predict such structures or to use them to functionally annotate RNAs into RNA families. However, to fully perform this analysis, researchers should utilize multiple tools, which require the constant parsing and processing of several intermediate files. This makes the large-scale prediction and annotation of RNAs a daunting task even to researchers with good computational or bioinformatics skills.
resultsWe present an automated pipeline named StructRNAfinder that predicts and annotates RNA families in transcript or genome sequences. This single tool not only displays the sequence/structural consensus alignments for each RNA family, according to Rfam database but also provides a taxonomic overview for each assigned functional RNA. Moreover, we implemented a user-friendly web service that allows researchers to upload their own nucleotide sequences in order to perform the whole analysis. Finally, we provided a stand-alone version of StructRNAfinder to be used in large-scale projects. The tool was developed under GNU General Public License (GPLv3) and is freely available at http://structrnafinder.integrativebioinformatics.me .
conclusionsThe main advantage of StructRNAfinder relies on the large-scale processing and integrating the data obtained by each tool and database employed along the workflow, of which several files are generated and displayed in user-friendly reports, useful for downstream analyses and data exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.