Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453946›Full record

ArticleContraception2018

The sexual and reproductive health of foreign-born women in the United States.

Athena Tapales, Ayana Douglas-Hall, Hannah Whitehead

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Return Migration and Contraceptive Use in Mexico.Studies in family planning · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Decline of Abortion in Spain Over the Last Decade.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Connections between reproductive health and cognitive aging among women enrolled in the HCHS/SOL and SOL-INCA.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Athena TapalesGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10038, USA. Electronic address: atapales@guttmacher.org.
Ayana Douglas-HallGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10038, USA. Electronic address: adouglashall@guttmacher.org.
Hannah WhiteheadGuttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10038, USA. Electronic address: hwhitehead@guttmacher.org.
Guttmacher Institute · US

Funding

Research Infrastructure for Demographic and Behavioral Population Science Dissemination CoreR24HD074034 · NICHD · GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE · PI KOST, KATHRYN L · 2013 to 2017
$462k
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD074034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) behaviors, health insurance coverage and use of SRH services of women in the United States (U.S.) by nativity, disaggregated by race and ethnicity. STUDY

designWe analyzed publicly available and restricted data from the National Survey of Family Growth to assess differences and similarities between foreign-born and U.S.-born women, both overall and within Hispanic, non-Hispanic (NH) white, NH black and NH Asian groups.

resultsA larger proportion of foreign-born women than U.S.-born women lacked health insurance coverage. Foreign-born women utilized SRH services at lower rates than U.S.-born women; this effect diminished at the multivariate level, although race and ethnicity differences remained. Overall, foreign-born women were less likely to pay for SRH services with private insurance than U.S.-born women. Foreign-born women were less likely to use the most effective contraceptive methods than U.S.-born women, with some variation across race and ethnicity: NH white and NH black foreign-born women were less likely to use highly effective contraceptive methods than their U.S.-born counterparts, but among Hispanic women, the reverse was true.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that the SRH behaviors, needs and outcomes of foreign-born women differ from those of U.S-born women within the same race/ethnic group. IMPLICATIONS: This paper contributes to the emergent literature on immigrants in the U.S. by laying the foundation for further research on the SRH of the foreign-born population in the country, which is critical for developing public health policies and programs to understand better and serve this growing and diverse population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageReproductive BehaviorReproductive Health ServicesSexual BehaviorUnited StatesYoung AdultForeign-bornHealth insurance coverageImmigrantNSFGUtilization of services

Identifiers

PMID29453946
PMCPMC6029875
OpenAlexW2794077359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.