Trial reportJAMA dermatology2018
Effect of Dermatology Consultation on Outcomes for Patients With Presumed Cellulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01706913 (A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Impact of Dermatology Consultations on the Hospital Course of Patients Admitted for Cellulitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Impact of Dermatology Consultations on the Hospital Course of Patients Admitted for Cellulitis
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic stewardship and dermatology consultation in cellulitis management: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Pooled it
- Misdiagnosis of Uncomplicated Cellulitis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The effect of histopathologic analysis and tissue cultures on inpatient management of cellulitis: a randomized control trial.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Trial
- Article
- Reconstructing Dermatology Education: The Backward Design and Curricular Content Expansion.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Hospital Admission for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections From an Observation Unit.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- The financial impact and utilization of inpatient dermatology services: historical insights and future implications.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Review
- Reliability and Accuracy of Inpatient Teledermatology in Asian Patients.Telemedicine reports · 2025Article
- The United States dermatology inpatient workforce between 2013 and 2019: a Medicare analysis reveals contraction of the workforce and vast access deserts-a cross-sectional analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- The Natural History of Antibiotic-Treated Lower Limb Cellulitis: Analysis of Data Extracted From a Multicenter Clinical Trial.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Quantitative Benefit of Inpatient Dermatology Services on Hospital Length of Stay in an Academic Hospital.Cureus · 2023Article
- The impact of a point-of-care visual clinical decision support tool on admissions for cellulitis in the University of Maryland medical system.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023Article
- Using Thermal Imaging to Track Cellulitis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Histiocytoid giant cellulitis-like Sweet syndrome at the site of sternal aspiration: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Cellulitis: A Review of Current Practice Guidelines and Differentiation from Pseudocellulitis.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2022Review
- Inpatient Teledermatology: a Review.Current dermatology reports · 2022Review
- A strategy for empowering clinicians and increasing innovation: the Magic Wand Initiative.Archives of dermatological research · 2021Article
- Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy with Infrared Thermography for Accurate Prediction of Cellulitis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2021Article
- 55-year old woman with erysipelas.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Each year, cellulitis leads to 650 000 hospital admissions and is estimated to cost $3.7 billion in the United States. Previous literature has demonstrated a high misdiagnosis rate for cellulitis, which results in unnecessary antibiotic use and health care cost. Objective: To determine whether dermatologic consultation decreases duration of hospital stay or intravenous antibiotic treatment duration in patients with cellulitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in a large urban tertiary care hospital between October 2012 and January 2017, with 1-month follow-up duration. Patients were randomized to the control group, which received the standard of care (ie, treatment by primary medicine team), or the intervention group, which received dermatology consultation. Medical chart review of demographic information and hospital courses was performed. Adult patients hospitalized with presumed diagnosis of cellulitis were eligible. A total of 1300 patients were screened, 1125 were excluded, and 175 were included. Statistical analysis was employed to identify significant outcome differences between the 2 groups. Interventions: Dermatology consultation within 24 hours of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Length of hospital stay and duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Results: Of 175 participants, 70 (40%) were women and 105 (60%) were men. The mean age was 58.8 years. Length of hospital stay was not statistically different between the 2 groups. The duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment (<4 days: 86.4% vs 72.5%; absolute difference, 13.9%; 95% CI, 1.9%-25.9%; P = .04) and duration of total antibiotic treatment was significantly lower in patients who had early dermatology consultation (<10 days: 50.6% vs 32.5%; absolute difference, 18.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%-32.5%; P = .01). Clinical improvement at 2 weeks was significantly higher for those in the intervention group (79 [89.3%] vs 59 [68.3%]; absolute difference, 21.0%; 95% CI, 9.3%-32.7%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in 1-month readmission rate between the groups (4 [4.5%] vs 6 [6.9%]; absolute difference, -2.4%; 95% CI, -9.3% to 4.5%; P = .54). In the intervention group, the rate of cellulitis misdiagnosis was 30.7% (27 of 88 participants). Among the entire cohort, 101 (57.7%) patients were treated with courses of antibiotics longer than what is recommended by guidelines. Conclusions and Relevance: Early dermatologic consultation can improve outcomes in patients with suspected cellulitis by identifying alternate diagnoses, treating modifiable risk factors, and decreasing length of antibiotic treatment. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01706913.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.