Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453872›Full record

Trial reportJAMA dermatology2018

Effect of Dermatology Consultation on Outcomes for Patients With Presumed Cellulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lauren N Ko, Anna C Garza-Mayers, Jessica St John, Lauren Strazzula, Priyanka Vedak, Radhika Shah, Allison S Dobry, Sowmya R Rao, Leslie W Milne, Blair Alden Parry and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01706913 (A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Impact of Dermatology Consultations on the Hospital Course of Patients Admitted for Cellulitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01706913 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Impact of Dermatology Consultations on the Hospital Course of Patients Admitted for Cellulitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2012 to 2018Enrolled246ConditionsCellulitisArmsDermatology consult
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Using Thermal Imaging to Track Cellulitis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Inpatient Teledermatology: a Review.Current dermatology reports · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy with Infrared Thermography for Accurate Prediction of Cellulitis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2021
    Article
  20. 55-year old woman with erysipelas.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren N KoDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anna C Garza-MayersDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jessica St JohnDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lauren StrazzulaDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Priyanka VedakDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Radhika ShahDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Allison S DobryDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sowmya R RaoMassachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center; Department of Surgery, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leslie W MilneDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Blair Alden ParryDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniela KroshinskyDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USBoston University · USHarvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Each year, cellulitis leads to 650 000 hospital admissions and is estimated to cost $3.7 billion in the United States. Previous literature has demonstrated a high misdiagnosis rate for cellulitis, which results in unnecessary antibiotic use and health care cost. Objective: To determine whether dermatologic consultation decreases duration of hospital stay or intravenous antibiotic treatment duration in patients with cellulitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in a large urban tertiary care hospital between October 2012 and January 2017, with 1-month follow-up duration. Patients were randomized to the control group, which received the standard of care (ie, treatment by primary medicine team), or the intervention group, which received dermatology consultation. Medical chart review of demographic information and hospital courses was performed. Adult patients hospitalized with presumed diagnosis of cellulitis were eligible. A total of 1300 patients were screened, 1125 were excluded, and 175 were included. Statistical analysis was employed to identify significant outcome differences between the 2 groups. Interventions: Dermatology consultation within 24 hours of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Length of hospital stay and duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Results: Of 175 participants, 70 (40%) were women and 105 (60%) were men. The mean age was 58.8 years. Length of hospital stay was not statistically different between the 2 groups. The duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment (<4 days: 86.4% vs 72.5%; absolute difference, 13.9%; 95% CI, 1.9%-25.9%; P = .04) and duration of total antibiotic treatment was significantly lower in patients who had early dermatology consultation (<10 days: 50.6% vs 32.5%; absolute difference, 18.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%-32.5%; P = .01). Clinical improvement at 2 weeks was significantly higher for those in the intervention group (79 [89.3%] vs 59 [68.3%]; absolute difference, 21.0%; 95% CI, 9.3%-32.7%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in 1-month readmission rate between the groups (4 [4.5%] vs 6 [6.9%]; absolute difference, -2.4%; 95% CI, -9.3% to 4.5%; P = .54). In the intervention group, the rate of cellulitis misdiagnosis was 30.7% (27 of 88 participants). Among the entire cohort, 101 (57.7%) patients were treated with courses of antibiotics longer than what is recommended by guidelines. Conclusions and Relevance: Early dermatologic consultation can improve outcomes in patients with suspected cellulitis by identifying alternate diagnoses, treating modifiable risk factors, and decreasing length of antibiotic treatment. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01706913.

Indexed as

DermatologyReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCellulitisDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29453872
PMCPMC5876891
OpenAlexW2794232656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.