Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453753›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2018

Pediatric astrocytic tumor grading: comparison between arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI perfusion.

Giovanni Morana, Domenico Tortora, Serena Staglianò, Paolo Nozza, Samantha Mascelli, Mariasavina Severino, Gianluca Piatelli, Alessandro Consales, Maarten Lequin, Maria Luisa Garrè and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07427316 (Role of Arterial Spin Labelling Magnetic Resonance Perfusion in The Grading of Pediatric Brain Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07427316 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Role of Arterial Spin Labelling Magnetic Resonance Perfusion in The Grading of Pediatric Brain Tumors

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled20ConditionsPediatric Brain Tumors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni MoranaNeuroradiology Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, via Gerolamo Gaslini 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy. giovannimorana@gaslini.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-5969
Domenico TortoraNeuroradiology Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, via Gerolamo Gaslini 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy.
Serena StaglianòRadiology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Paolo NozzaPathology Unit, Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.
Samantha MascelliNeurosurgery Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Mariasavina SeverinoNeuroradiology Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, via Gerolamo Gaslini 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy.
Gianluca PiatelliNeurosurgery Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Alessandro ConsalesNeurosurgery Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Maarten LequinDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maria Luisa GarrèNeuro-oncology Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea RossiNeuroradiology Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, via Gerolamo Gaslini 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy.
Istituto Giannina Gaslini · ITEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare arterial spin labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI perfusion with respect to diagnostic performance in tumor grading in pediatric patients with low- and high-grade astrocytic tumors (AT).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 37 children with histologically proven treatment naive low- and high-grade AT who underwent concomitant pre-operative ASL and DSC MRI perfusion. Studies were performed on a 1.5 T scanner, and a pulsed technique was used for ASL. DSC data were post-processed with a leakage correction software. Normalization of tumor perfusion parameters was performed with contralateral normal appearing gray matter. Normalized cerebral blood volume (nCBV) values in the most perfused area of each neoplasm were compared with normalized DSC-derived cerebral blood flow (nDSC-CBF) and ASL-derived cerebral blood flow (nASL-CBF) data, and correlated with WHO tumor grade. Statistics included Pearson's chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsA significant correlation was demonstrated between DSC and ASL data (p < 0.001). Significant differences in terms of DSC and ASL data were found between low- and high-grade AT (p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated similar performances between all parameters in predicting tumor grade (nCBV: AUC 0.96, p < 0.001; nDSC-CBF: AUC 0.98, p < 0.001; nASL-CBF: AUC 0.96, p < 0.001).

conclusionsNormalized pulsed ASL performed with a 1.5 T scanner provides comparable results to DSC MRI perfusion in pediatric AT and may allow distinction between high- and low-grade AT.

Indexed as

Spin LabelsAdolescentAstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesSpin LabelsArterial spin labelingBrain tumorDiffuse midline gliomaPediatricPerfusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID29453753
OpenAlexW2788068518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.