Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453750›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Administration of Lactobacillus plantarum Lp62 to dam rats at the end of delivery and during lactation affects TGF-β1 level and nutritional milk composition, and body weight of pups.

Gladistone Correia Messias, Ana Marta Novais Rocha, Beatriz Manuela Silva Santos, Ana Marques Botelho, Dhaísa Cristhina Alves Silva, Erika Santos Porto, Marina Lima Dos Anjos, Rayra Almeida Sousa, Mara Viana Silva, Thainara Barros da Rocha and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gladistone Correia MessiasMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Ana Marta Novais RochaMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Beatriz Manuela Silva SantosMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Ana Marques BotelhoMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Dhaísa Cristhina Alves SilvaMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Erika Santos PortoMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Marina Lima Dos AnjosMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Rayra Almeida SousaMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Mara Viana SilvaMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Thainara Barros da RochaMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Aracely Vieira de MeloMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Manoela Rios Trindade CarneiroMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Nayonara Santana AguiarMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Patrícia Prado SantosMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Erika Pereira de SouzaMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Mariluze Peixoto CruzMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Lucas Miranda MarquesMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Raquel Passos RezendeMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Carla Cristina RomanoMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
Ana Paula UetanabaroDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology of Microorganisms, State University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Gabriel VinderolaFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Industrial Lactology (INLAIN, UNL-CONICET), National University of Santa Fe Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Regiane YatsudaMultidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. reyatsuda@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5018-9978
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BR

Funding

CAPES ScholarshipCNPq scholarshipFAPESB PIBICFAPESB REDE 011/2014FAPESB ScholashipFNDE (MEC/SESU) PETUFBA PIBIC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLactobacillus plantarum Lp62 is a lactic acid bacteria strain that has been isolated from cocoa beans and exhibited probiotic potential. The influence of oral administration of L. plantarum Lp62 on the growth of rat's pups; on yield, cytokines and milk composition was studied.

methodsLactobacillus plantarum Lp62 is a lactic acid bacteria strain that has been isolated from cocoa beans. It was administered daily by gavage to Wistar rats (n = 8), from the 7th day before delivery and for 20 days during lactation, in a concentration of 1.44 × 10

resultsSupplementation with L. plantarum L62 resulted in significant higher weight of pups (p < 0.05), with similar weight on dams (p > 0.05). The milk yield was not altered by L. plantarum treatment, but the levels of protein, triglycerides and cholesterol were increased (p < 0.05), with no difference in lactose concentration (p > 0.05). Levels of TGF-β1 were higher in the milk of L. plantarum treatment (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe treatment of dams at the end of pregnancy and lactation with L. plantarum Lp62 increased nutritional content of milk, probably contributing to the higher weight of the pups. The higher levels of TGF-β1 in the milk, could promote immune benefits to the pups. Further studies in this field are needed to prove the potential use of L. plantarum Lp62 as a probiotic.

Indexed as

Lactiplantibacillus plantarumAdministration, OralAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnimals, SucklingBody WeightFemaleLactationModels, AnimalPregnancyPregnancy, AnimalRatsRats, WistarTransforming Growth Factor beta1Transforming Growth Factor beta1ImmunologyLactobacillus plantarumMilkProbioticPupsRats

Identifiers

PMID29453750
OpenAlexW2788448555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.