Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453729›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2018

Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.

Natasha Gupta, Shanti Mohling, Rebecca Mckendrick, Rayan Elkattah, Jenny Holcombe, Robert S Furr, Todd Boren, Stephen DePasquale

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natasha GuptaMinimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA. docnatasha3@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-1312
Shanti MohlingMinimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Rebecca MckendrickMinimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Rayan ElkattahMinimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Jenny HolcombeMinimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Robert S FurrMinimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Todd BorenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Stephen DePasqualeDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy and extraction of specimen via mini-laparotomy (RHML) versus open hysterectomy (OH) when uterus weighs more than 250 g. To study the factors determining the length of hospital stay in 2 groups. A retrospective analysis of all hysterectomies performed for uterus weighing more than 250 g from the year 2012 to 2015 was conducted. A total of 140 patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of surgery; RHML (n = 82) and OH (n = 58). Mini-laparotomy consisted of a customised incision connecting 2 left lateral port sites for specimen extraction after completing the hysterectomy robotically. Patient factors and perioperative outcomes were compared using Student's t tests and Chi-square analysis. Mean length of stay (RHML = 1.4 days; OH = 3.4 days), estimated blood loss (EBL) (RHML = 119.9 ml; OH = 547.5 ml) and operative time (RHML = 191.5 min; OH = 162.8 min) were significantly different. No significant differences were noted for patient BMI, age, comorbidities, intraoperative complications, pathology of uterus and uterus weight. Postoperative complications were significantly different between two groups (RHML = 6.0%; OH = 15.5%; p = .021). None of the patients stayed less than 24 h in OH group compared to 59.8% patients in RHML group. Type of procedure (p = .004) and EBL (p = .002) significantly predicted the length of stay. Patients undergoing RHML have significantly shorter length of stay, EBL and postoperative complications than OH. The operative time for RHML was longer than OH, but the overall decreased length of stay overcomes this disadvantage. RHML approach retains the benefits of da Vinci, while simultaneously preserving the specimen.

Indexed as

Organ SizeBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansHysterectomyLaparotomyLength of StayMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresUterusHysterectomyLarge uteriMini-laparotomyMorcellationRobotic surgerySpecimen removal

Identifiers

PMID29453729
OpenAlexW2793999634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.