SynthesisHeart failure reviews2018
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated three-dimensional left atrial analysis on computed tomography angiography: reproducibility and workflow efficiency of eight clinically relevant metrics using a deep learning pipeline.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Device-Assisted Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion: From Basic Sciences to Clinical Applications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion versus Novel Oral Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation-One-Year Survival.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Ischemic Stroke and Heart Failure: Facts and Numbers. An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Long-term effect of anticoagulation following left atrial appendage occlusion with the LARIAT device in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: impact on thromboembolism, bleeding and mortality. Real life data.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2020Article
- Successful left atrial appendage closure in a patient with prior patent foramen ovale occlusion.HeartRhythm case reports · 2019Article
- Long term outcomes after left atrial appendage closure with the LARIAT device-Stroke risk reduction over five years follow-up.PloS one · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is commonly coexistent with heart failure, and the management of the heart failure patient would be incomplete without an appreciation for atrial fibrillation management. There are many complications associated with oral anticoagulation in the prevention of stroke related to atrial fibrillation. In recent years, the advent of several percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion/closure strategies has sought to provide an alternative treatment modality. Here, we systematically review the published literature to investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous LAA occlusion/closure devices. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and the FDA Medical Devices database. Using prespecified criteria, we identified studies of the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St. Jude Medical), Amplatzer Amulet (St. Jude Medical), Lariat suture delivery device (SentreHeart), and Watchman device (Boston Scientific). We analyzed 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 15 non-randomized registries that satisfied the study criteria. The two RCT both studied the Watchman device versus standard warfarin therapy; the studies indicate that the Watchman may be non-inferior to warfarin. Long-term efficacy outcomes for the Watchman device are promising. Data regarding the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug, Amplatzer Amulet, and Lariat suture delivery device are limited by the paucity of RCT data. High-quality prospective research is needed to directly compare LAA occlusion/closure strategies against one another as well as versus the direct oral anticoagulation medications. Data regarding the role of LAA occlusion in the heart failure population are lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.