SynthesisWorld journal of urology2018
The effectiveness of targeted relative to empiric prophylaxis on infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rectal Culture-Based Versus Empirical Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Infectious Complications in Men Undergoing Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized, Nonblinded Multicenter Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Trial
- A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine suppository before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.Medicine · 2019Trial
- Comparison of Infectious Complications After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Under Two Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens: Ceftriaxone Plus Cefixime Versus Ciprofloxacin Plus Gentamicin.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Ciprofloxacin Versus Fosfomycin for Empirical Prophylaxis Before Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Clinical, Microbiological, and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Infectious complications of transrectal prostate biopsy in patients receiving targeted antibiotic prophylaxis after urethral and rectal swab versus standard prophylaxis: A prospective comparative study.Prostate international · 2024Article
- Clinical Value of a Routine Urine Culture Prior to Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Ciprofloxacin Alone vs. Ciprofloxacin plus an Aminoglycoside for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following a Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Molecular genetic testing does not improve the detection of fluoroquinolone resistance before transrectal prostate biopsy.Prostate international · 2022Article
- Occurrence and significance of fluoroquinolone-resistant and ESBL-producingJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022Article
- Article
- Acceptability of innovative culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis strategies: a multi-method study on experiences regarding transrectal prostate biopsy.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Article
- The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010-2019.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Article
- Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war.World journal of urology · 2020Review
- Turkish Urologists' preferences regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.Turkish journal of urology · 2020Article
- Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands.BMC urology · 2020Observational
- Phenotypic screening for quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Article
- Infection Prophylaxis in Urological Diagnostic and Surgical Procedures - A narrative review and recommendations.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
- Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRectal culture screening for fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate (TRUSPB) biopsy and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) may decrease post-TRUSPB infection rates compared to empiric (EAP) regimens. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of targeted relative to empiric prophylaxis regimens on rates of infectious complications after TRUSPB and to determine the baseline prevalence of FQ resistance based on prior rectal swabs.
methodsAn electronic search within literature databases including EMBASE and Web of Science (all databases) for articles assessing TAP as an approach to TRUSPB prophylaxis was conducted. Quality assessment was performed using the Hoy instrument. Meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL 5.3.
resultsFrom 15 studies (eight retrospective and seven prospective) representing 12,320 participants, infectious complication incidence was 3.4% in EAP and 0.8% in TAP patients. The number needed to treat with TAP to avoid one more infection when compared to the EAP group was 39. Effect sizes were homogeneous. Prevalence of FQ resistance showed low (15%) and high (28%) subgroups, likely due to region of origin (within and outside USA, respectively).
conclusionsRectal culture prior to TRUSPB and use of TAP adjusts for endemic FQ resistance and is associated with less infectious complications and resulting morbidity when compared to EAP. Overtreatment associated with augmented prophylaxis approaches may be reduced as a result. Further prospective assessment and cost-benefit analyses are required before widespread implementation can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.