ArticleBiological cybernetics2018
Sustained sensorimotor control as intermittent decisions about prediction errors: computational framework and application to ground vehicle steering.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated virtual reality and musical biofeedback for intensity-guided training on stationary cycling: A comparative feasibility study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- A control engineering perspective on the advantages of efference copies.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
- Intermittent control and retinal optic flow when maintaining a curvilinear path.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A model of dyadic merging interactions explains human drivers' behavior from control inputs to decisions.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Should I Stay or Should I Go? Cognitive Modeling of Left-Turn Gap Acceptance Decisions in Human Drivers.Human factors · 2024Article
- Brownian processes in human motor control support descending neural velocity commands.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dynamic primitives in constrained action: systematic changes in the zero-force trajectory.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Explaining human interactions on the road by large-scale integration of computational psychological theory.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Drivers use active gaze to monitor waypoints during automated driving.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Effects of an Active Visuomotor Steering Task on Covert Attention.Journal of eye movement research · 2019Article
- A computational model for driver's cognitive state, visual perception and intermittent attention in a distracted car following task.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A conceptual and computational framework is proposed for modelling of human sensorimotor control and is exemplified for the sensorimotor task of steering a car. The framework emphasises control intermittency and extends on existing models by suggesting that the nervous system implements intermittent control using a combination of (1) motor primitives, (2) prediction of sensory outcomes of motor actions, and (3) evidence accumulation of prediction errors. It is shown that approximate but useful sensory predictions in the intermittent control context can be constructed without detailed forward models, as a superposition of simple prediction primitives, resembling neurobiologically observed corollary discharges. The proposed mathematical framework allows straightforward extension to intermittent behaviour from existing one-dimensional continuous models in the linear control and ecological psychology traditions. Empirical data from a driving simulator are used in model-fitting analyses to test some of the framework's main theoretical predictions: it is shown that human steering control, in routine lane-keeping and in a demanding near-limit task, is better described as a sequence of discrete stepwise control adjustments, than as continuous control. Results on the possible roles of sensory prediction in control adjustment amplitudes, and of evidence accumulation mechanisms in control onset timing, show trends that match the theoretical predictions; these warrant further investigation. The results for the accumulation-based model align with other recent literature, in a possibly converging case against the type of threshold mechanisms that are often assumed in existing models of intermittent control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.