ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018
Changes in medicine prescription following a medication review in older high-risk patients with polypharmacy.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacist-led deprescribing of cardiovascular and diabetes medication within a clinical medication review: the LeMON study (Less Medicines in Older Patients in the Netherlands), a cluster randomized controlled trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Intervention Focused on the Deprescribing of Cardiovascular and Antidiabetic Medication in Older Patients With Polypharmacy: Patients' and Pharmacists' Experiences.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Deprescribing for people living with dementia: ALIGNing interventions and outcomes.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Patients' Characterization, Pattern of Medication Use, and Factors Associated with Polypharmacy: A Cross-Sectional Study Focused on Eight Units of the Portuguese National Network for Long-Term Integrated Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automated Detection of Patients at High Risk of Polypharmacy including Anticholinergic and Sedative Medications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- A pharmacist-led medication review service with a deprescribing focus guided by implementation science.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Exploration of Symptom Scale as an Outcome for Deprescribing: A Medication Review Study in Nursing Homes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Older Patients: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Qualitative and quantitative research of medication review and drug-related problems in Hungarian community pharmacies: a pilot study.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- The effect of a structured medication review on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: The study protocol.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019Article
- Development and Piloting of an Algorithm to Select Older Patients for Different Types of Medication Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Influencers on deprescribing practice of primary healthcare providers in Nova Scotia: An examination using behavior change frameworks.Medicine access @ point of careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The more (inappropriate) drugs a patient uses, the higher the risk of drug related problems. To reduce these risks, medication reviews can be performed. Objective To report changes in the prescribed number of (potentially inappropriate) drugs before and after performing a medication review in high-risk polypharmacy patients. A secondary objective was to study reasons for continuing potentially inappropriate drugs (PIDs). Setting Dutch community pharmacy and general medical practice. Methods A retrospective longitudinal intervention study with a pre-test/post-test design and follow-up of 1 week and 3 months was performed. The study population consisted of 126 patients with polypharmacy and with additional risk for drug related problems that underwent a medication review in five community pharmacies. The medication review was performed by the pharmacist in close cooperation with the general practitioner of each corresponding patient. Main outcome measure Number of (potentially inappropriate) drugs, and appropriateness of prescribed medicines. Results The average number of drugs a patient used 1 day before the review was 8.7 (SD = 2.9), which decreased (p < 0.05) to 8.3 (SD = 2.7) 1 week after the review, and to 8.4 (SD = 2.6) 3 months after the review. The average number of PIDs was initially 0.6 (SD = 0.8) per patient and decreased to 0.4 (SD = 0.6, p < 0.05). Twenty-two of the 241 initial drug changes (9%) were deprescribed during follow-up. Registered reasons for continuing PIDs are clinical or patients' preferences. Conclusions Performing medication reviews in polypharmacy patients seems useful to continue at least in high-risk patients in The Netherlands. The time-consuming reviews could be limited to patients who are willing to change their medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.