Correction to: Genetic analysis of multi-environmental spring wheat trials identifies genomic regions for locus-specific trade-offs for grain weight and grain number.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Genome-wide association mapping for high temperature tolerance in wheat through 90k SNP array using physiological and yield traits.PloS one · 2022
   Article
2. Genome-wide association mapping of bread wheat genotypes for sustainable food security and yield potential under limited water conditions.PloS one · 2022
   Article
3. Dissection of genetic factors underlying grain size and fine mapping of QTgw.cau-7D in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
   Article
4. Identification and Validation of New Stable QTLs for Grain Weight and Size by Multiple Mapping Models in Common Wheat.Frontiers in genetics · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Genetic analysis of multi-environmental spring wheat trials identifies genomic regions for locus-specific trade-offs for grain weight and grain number.2018

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract