Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453495›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

Comparison of concentrations of drugs between blood samples with and without fluoride additive-important findings for Δ

Christopher Wiedfeld, Julia Krueger, Gisela Skopp, Frank Musshoff

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher WiedfeldForensisch Toxikologisches Centrum GmbH, Bayerstraße 53, 80335, Munich, Germany. c.wiedfeld@ftc-muenchen.de.
Julia KruegerForensisch Toxikologisches Centrum GmbH, Bayerstraße 53, 80335, Munich, Germany.
Gisela SkoppForensisch Toxikologisches Centrum GmbH, Bayerstraße 53, 80335, Munich, Germany.
Frank MusshoffForensisch Toxikologisches Centrum GmbH, Bayerstraße 53, 80335, Munich, Germany.
Bayer (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluoride is a common stabilizing agent in forensic toxicology to avoid the frequent problem of degradation of drugs in blood samples especially described for cocaine. In cases only samples with addition of fluoride are available, it is a crucial question if also concentrations of common drugs other than cocaine (amphetamines, opiates and cannabinoids) are affected by fluoride. So far, there are only rare literature data available on discrepant results especially for Δ

Indexed as

Specimen HandlingAmphetamineChromatography, LiquidDronabinolExcipientsFluoridesForensic ToxicologyHumansIllicit DrugsTandem Mass SpectrometryAmphetamineDronabinolExcipientsFluoridesIllicit DrugsComparisonDrugsFluorideForensic toxicologyLimit values

Identifiers

PMID29453495
OpenAlexW2790830836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.