Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Temporal structure in spiking patterns of ganglion cells defines perceptual thresholds in rodents with subretinal prosthesis.

Elton Ho, Henri Lorach, Georges Goetz, Florian Laszlo, Xin Lei, Theodore Kamins, Jean-Charles Mariani, Alexander Sher, Daniel Palanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Restoration of Sight with Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Photogenerated Electrical Fields for Biomedical Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elton HoDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. eltonho@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4645-6156
Henri LorachHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Georges GoetzHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-0554
Florian LaszloHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Xin LeiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Theodore KaminsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-1161
Jean-Charles MarianiHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Alexander SherSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Daniel PalankerHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

High Resolution Photovoltaic Retinal ProsthesisR01EY018608 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2009 to 2016
$9.2M
Photovoltaic Subretinal Prosthesis with High Pixel DensityR01EY027786 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018608NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subretinal prostheses are designed to restore sight in patients blinded by retinal degeneration using electrical stimulation of the inner retinal neurons. To relate retinal output to perception, we studied behavioral thresholds in blind rats with photovoltaic subretinal prostheses stimulated by full-field pulsed illumination at 20 Hz, and measured retinal ganglion cell (RGC) responses to similar stimuli ex-vivo. Behaviorally, rats exhibited startling response to changes in brightness, with an average contrast threshold of 12%, which could not be explained by changes in the average RGC spiking rate. However, RGCs exhibited millisecond-scale variations in spike timing, even when the average rate did not change significantly. At 12% temporal contrast, changes in firing patterns of prosthetic response were as significant as with 2.3% contrast steps in visible light stimulation of healthy retinas. This suggests that millisecond-scale changes in spiking patterns define perceptual thresholds of prosthetic vision. Response to the last pulse in the stimulation burst lasted longer than the steady-state response during the burst. This may be interpreted as an excitatory OFF response to prosthetic stimulation, and can explain behavioral response to decrease in illumination. Contrast enhancement of images prior to delivery to subretinal prosthesis can partially compensate for reduced contrast sensitivity of prosthetic vision.

Indexed as

Visual PerceptionAnimalsContrast SensitivityElectric StimulationRatsRetinal Ganglion CellsSensory Thresholds

Identifiers

PMID29453455
PMCPMC5816604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.