ArticleBMJ open2018
Role of the family doctor in the management of adults with obesity: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of overweight and obesity in primary care-A systematic overview of international evidence-based guidelines.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2019Pooled it
- Article
- Obese patients' dissatisfaction with weight, body image and clinicians' interaction at a district hospital; Gauteng.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023Article
- "We bleed for our community:" A qualitative exploration of the implementation of a pragmatic weight gain prevention trial from the perspectives of community health center professionals.BMC public health · 2023Article
- In it for the long haul: the complexities of managing overweight in family practice: qualitative thematic analysis from the Health eLiteracy for Prevention in General Practice (HeLP-GP) trial.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Primary care providers' perceived barriers to obesity treatment and opportunities for improvement: A mixed methods study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Factors associated with delayed first ophthalmological consultation for primary glaucoma: a qualitative interview study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Consulting Obese and Overweight Patients for Nutrition and Physical Activity in Primary Healthcare in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Multimorbidity patterns across race/ethnicity as stratified by age and obesity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Attitudes and treatment practice of general practitioners towards patients with obesity in primary care.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Lifestyle-related advice in the management of obesity: A step-wise approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2018
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesObesity management is an important issue for the international primary care community. This scoping review examines the literature describing the role of the family doctor in managing adults with obesity. The methods were prospectively published and followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.
settingPrimary care. Adult patients. INCLUDED PAPERS: Peer-reviewed and grey literature with the keywords obesity, primary care and family doctors. All literature published up to September 2015. 3294 non-duplicate papers were identified and 225 articles included after full-text review. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were extracted on the family doctors' involvement in different aspects of management, and whether whole person and person-centred care were explicitly mentioned.
results110 papers described interventions in primary care and family doctors were always involved in diagnosing obesity and often in recruitment of participants. A clear description of the provider involved in an intervention was often lacking. It was difficult to determine if interventions took account of whole person and person-centredness. Most opinion papers and clinical overviews described an extensive role for the family doctor in management; in contrast, research on current practices depicted obesity as undermanaged by family doctors. International guidelines varied in their description of the role of the family doctor with a more extensive role suggested by guidelines from family medicine organisations.
conclusionsThere is a disconnect between how family doctors are involved in primary care interventions, the message in clinical overviews and opinion papers, and observed current practice of family doctors. The role of family doctors in international guidelines for obesity may reflect the strength of primary care in the originating health system. Reporting of primary care interventions could be improved by enhanced descriptions of the providers involved and explanation of how the pillars of primary care are used in intervention development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.