ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2018
Adoption of Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Management of Patients With Heart Failure.
Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten years real-world experience with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2026Pooled it
- Five Years of Sacubitril/Valsartan-a Safety Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials and Real-World Pharmacovigilance.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Sacubitril/valsartan in real-life European patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- Integrating Out-of-Pocket Costs Into Shared Decision-Making for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Stepped-Wedge Trial (POCKET-COST-HF).Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Trial
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Sweden: patient adherence and persistence to quadruple pharmacotherapy prescription.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Relationship between industry payments to physicians and prescription patterns for PCSK9is, ARNis and DOACs: A report from the NCDR PINNACLE registry.American heart journal · 2026Article
- Adherence to guideline-directed medical treatments in heart failure. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- Challenges Related to Out-of-Pocket Costs in Heart Failure Management.Circulation. Heart failure · 2025Review
- Industry marketing payments to physicians and prescription patterns for sacubitril/valsartan in the USA.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2025Article
- Assessment of a systematic approach for implementing novel medications in clinical practice: an observational study with dapagliflozin.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Observational
- Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients Requiring Hemodialysis.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Trajectories of Sacubitril/Valsartan Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Heart Failure.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Pharmacoutilization and adherence to sacubitril/valsartan in real world: the REAL.IT study in HFrEF.ESC heart failure · 2024Observational
- The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2024Article
- Eliminating Health Disparities in Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and Dyslipidemia: A Path Toward Achieving Pharmacoequity.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023Review
- Optimizing outcomes in heart failure: 2022 and beyond.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Financial Toxicity of Medical Management of Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Deciding Whether to Take Sacubitril/Valsartan: How Cardiologists and Patients Discuss Out-of-Pocket Costs.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Effects of sacubitril-valsartan on central and obstructive apneas in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Article
- A population-based study of factors associated with systemic treatment in advanced prostate cancer decedents.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in July 2015. We aimed to assess the adoption and prescription drug costs of sacubitril/valsartan in its first 18 months after Food and Drug Administration approval. METHODS AND
resultsUsing a large US insurance database, we identified privately insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries who filled a first prescription for sacubitril/valsartan between July 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. We compared them to patients treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. Outcomes included adoption, prescription drug costs, and 180-day adherence, defined as a proportion of days covered ≥80%. A total of 2244 patients initiated sacubitril/valsartan. Although the number of users increased over time, the proportion of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients taking sacubitril/valsartan remained low (<3%). Patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan were younger, more often male, with less comorbidity than those taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker. Although a majority of prescription costs were covered by the health plan (mean, $328.37; median, $362.44 per 30-day prescription), out-of-pocket costs were still high (mean, $71.16; median, $40.27). By comparison, median out-of-pocket costs were $2 to $3 for lisinopril, losartan, carvedilol, and spironolactone. Overall, 59.1% of patients were adherent to sacubitril/valsartan. Refill patterns suggested that nearly half of nonadherent patients discontinued sacubitril/valsartan within 180 days of starting.
conclusionsAdoption of sacubitril/valsartan after Food and Drug Administration approval has been slow and may be associated with the high cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.