Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453190›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Testing Behavior Change Techniques to Encourage Primary Care Physicians to Access Cancer Screening Audit and Feedback Reports: Protocol for a Factorial Randomized Experiment of Email Content.

Gratianne Vaisson, Holly O Witteman, Zachary Bouck, Caroline A Bravo, Laura Desveaux, Diego Llovet, Justin Presseau, Marianne Saragosa, Monica Taljaard, Shama Umar and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03124316 (Testing a Behavioural Approach to Improving Cancer Screening Rates Through Increased Use of Primary Care Feedback Reports), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03124316 nacompletednot on this map

Testing a Behavioural Approach to Improving Cancer Screening Rates Through Increased Use of Primary Care Feedback Reports

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2017 to 2017Enrolled5,525ConditionsEarly Detection of Cancer, Clinical TrialArmsAnticipated regret, Material incentive, Problem solving
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Gratianne VaissonDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-6083
Holly O WittemanOffice of Education and Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-0682
Zachary BouckInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3145-1915
Caroline A BravoPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3941-705X
Laura DesveauxInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-1865
Diego LlovetPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6911-5143
Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-0703
Marianne SaragosaInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-5971
Monica TaljaardClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3978-8961
Shama UmarPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-2430
Jeremy M GrimshawClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8015-8243
Jill TinmouthPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-2176
Noah M IversInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-2435
University of Ottawa · CACancer Care Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CACentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer Care Ontario's Screening Activity Report (SAR) is an online audit and feedback tool designed to help primary care physicians in Ontario, Canada, identify patients who are overdue for cancer screening or have abnormal results requiring follow-up. Use of the SAR is associated with increased screening rates. To encourage SAR use, Cancer Care Ontario sends monthly emails to registered primary care physicians announcing that updated data are available. However, analytics reveal that 50% of email recipients do not open the email and less than 7% click the embedded link to log in to their report.

objectiveThe goal of the study is to determine whether rewritten emails result in increased log-ins. This manuscript describes how different user- and theory-informed messages intended to improve the impact of the monthly emails will be experimentally tested and how a process evaluation will explore why and how any effects observed were (or were not) achieved.

methodsA user-centered approach was used to rewrite the content of the monthly email, including messages operationalizing 3 behavior change techniques: anticipated regret, material incentive (behavior), and problem solving. A pragmatic, 2x2x2 factorial experiment within a multiphase optimization strategy will test the redesigned emails with an embedded qualitative process evaluation to understand how and why the emails may or may not have worked. Trial outcomes will be ascertained using routinely collected administrative data. Physicians will be recruited for semistructured interviews using convenience and snowball sampling.

resultsAs of April 2017, 5576 primary care physicians across the province of Ontario, Canada, had voluntarily registered for the SAR, and in so doing, signed up to receive the monthly email updates. From May to August 2017 participants received the redesigned monthly emails with content specific to their allocated experimental condition prompting use of the SAR. We have not yet begun analyses.

conclusionsThis study will inform how to communicate effectively with primary care providers by email and identify which behavior change techniques tested are most effective at encouraging engagement with an audit and feedback report.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03124316; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03124316 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6w2MqDWGu).

Indexed as

behavior change techniquesclinical trials as topicearly detection of cancerelectronic mailfeedbackimplementation sciencepersuasive communicationprimary health careprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID29453190
PMCPMC5834752
OpenAlexW2785862452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.