Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453187›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2018

Quality of Web-Based Educational Interventions for Clinicians on Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Content and Usability Assessment.

Brittany L Rosen, James M Bishop, Skye L McDonald, Jessica A Kahn, Gary L Kreps

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04368455 (Increasing HPV Vaccination Rates Through Virtual Immersive Communication Training on Recommending Immunizations), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04368455 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Increasing HPV Vaccination Rates Through Virtual Immersive Communication Training on Recommending Immunizations: An Efficacy Study of VICTORI

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrittany RosenRan2020 to 2022Enrolled161ConditionsHuman Papilloma VirusArmsVirtual Immersive Communication Training on Recommending Immunizations (VICTORI), HPV Same Way Same Day App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brittany L Rosen *School of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3151-9927
James M BishopSchool of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0731-9407
Skye L McDonaldSchool of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8956-7470
Jessica A KahnDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-4976
Gary L KrepsCenter for Health and Risk Communication, Department of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5980-129X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates fall far short of Healthy People 2020 objectives. A leading reason is that clinicians do not recommend the vaccine consistently and strongly to girls and boys in the age group recommended for vaccination. Although Web-based HPV vaccine educational interventions for clinicians have been created to promote vaccination recommendations, rigorous evaluations of these interventions have not been conducted. Such evaluations are important to maximize the efficacy of educational interventions in promoting clinician recommendations for HPV vaccination.

objectiveThe objectives of our study were (1) to expand previous research by systematically identifying HPV vaccine Web-based educational interventions developed for clinicians and (2) to evaluate the quality of these Web-based educational interventions as defined by access, content, design, user evaluation, interactivity, and use of theory or models to create the interventions.

methodsCurrent HPV vaccine Web-based educational interventions were identified from general search engines (ie, Google), continuing medical education search engines, health department websites, and professional organization websites. Web-based educational interventions were included if they were created for clinicians (defined as individuals qualified to deliver health care services, such as physicians, clinical nurses, and school nurses, to patients aged 9 to 26 years), delivered information about the HPV vaccine and how to increase vaccination rates, and provided continuing education credits. The interventions' content and usability were analyzed using 6 key indicators: access, content, design, evaluation, interactivity, and use of theory or models.

resultsA total of 21 interventions were identified, out of which 7 (33%) were webinars, 7 (33%) were videos or lectures, and 7 (33%) were other (eg, text articles, website modules). Of the 21 interventions, 17 (81%) identified the purpose of the intervention, 12 (57%) provided the date that the information had been updated (7 of these were updated within the last 6 months), 14 (67%) provided the participants with the opportunity to provide feedback on the intervention, and 5 (24%) provided an interactive component. None of the educational interventions explicitly stated that a theory or model was used to develop the intervention.

conclusionsThis analysis demonstrates that a substantial proportion of Web-based HPV vaccine educational interventions has not been developed using established health education and design principles. Interventions designed using these principles may increase strong and consistent HPV vaccination recommendations by clinicians.

Indexed as

health personnelinternetpapillomavirus vaccinesprogram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID29453187
PMCPMC5834755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.