Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29453025›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2018

Material properties of the brain in injury-relevant conditions - Experiments and computational modeling.

Wei Zhao, Bryan Choate, Songbai Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Exponents of the one-term Ogden model: insights from simple shear.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Data-driven Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Human Head Models.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A network-based response feature matrix as a brain injury metric.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Bryan ChoateDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Songbai JiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01605, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA. Electronic address: sji@wpi.edu.

Funding

Accumulated white matter fiber strain from repetitive head impacts in contact sportsR01NS092853 · NINDS · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI JI, SONGBAI · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
Model-Based Cumulative Analysis of On-Field Head Impacts in Contact SportsR21NS088781 · NINDS · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI JI, SONGBAI · 2015 to 2016
$462k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092853NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS088781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Material properties of the brain have been extensively studied but remain poorly characterized. The vast variations in constitutive models and material constants are well documented. However, no study exists to translate the variations into disparities in impact-induced brain strains most relevant to brain injury. Here, we reviewed a subset of injury-relevant brain material properties either characterized in experiments or adopted in recent head injury models. To highlight how variations in measured brain material properties manifested in simulated brain strains, we selected six experiments that have provided a complete set of brain material model and constants to implement a common head injury model. Responses resulting from two extreme events representing a high-rate cadaveric head impact and a low-rate in vivo head rotation, respectively, varied substantially. We hypothesized, and further confirmed, that the time-varying shear moduli at the appropriate time scales (e.g., ~5 ms and ~40 ms corresponding to the impulse durations of the major acceleration peaks for the two impacts, respectively), rather than the initial or long-term shear moduli, were the most indicative of impact-induced brain strains. These results underscored the need to implement measured brain material properties into an actual head injury model for evaluation. They may also provide guidelines to better characterize brain material properties in future experiments and head injury models. Finally, our finding provided a practical solution to satisfy head injury model validation requirements at both ends of the impact severity spectrum. This would improve the confidence in model simulation performance across a range of time scales relevant to concussion and sub-concussion in the real-world.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalBrainBrain ConcussionBrain Injuries, TraumaticElasticityHumansShear StrengthConcussionHead injury modelHyperelasticityMaterial propertiesTraumatic brain injuryViscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID29453025
PMCPMC5841256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.