Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29452994›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2018

Transmission routes of respiratory viruses among humans.

Jasmin S Kutter, Monique I Spronken, Pieter L Fraaij, Ron Am Fouchier, Sander Herfst

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04320056 (Automated Oxygen Titration - Monitoring and Weaning in Patients With Infectious Pneumonia Requiring Oxygen - Impact on the Number of Interventions for Healthcare Workers. An Innovative Device to Manage Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia COVID Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 287 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
287citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
61.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04320056 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Automated Oxygen Titration - Monitoring and Weaning in Patients With Infectious Pneumonia Requiring Oxygen - Impact on the Number of Interventions for Healthcare Workers. An Innovative Device to Manage Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia COVID Study (Closed-Loop Oxygen to Verify That Healthcare Workers Interventions Decreaseduring Pneumonia)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled216ConditionsCoronavirus, Pneumonia, Oxygen ToxicityArmsStandard administration of oxygen flow, Automated oxygen administration - FreeO2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

287 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 622 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via aerosols.Reviews in medical virology · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

227 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasmin S KutterDepartment of Viroscience, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique I SpronkenDepartment of Viroscience, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter L FraaijDepartment of Viroscience, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, Subdivision Infectious diseases and Immunology, Erasmus Medical Centre - Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron Am FouchierDepartment of Viroscience, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander HerfstDepartment of Viroscience, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.herfst@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory tract infections can be caused by a wide variety of viruses. Airborne transmission via droplets and aerosols enables some of these viruses to spread efficiently among humans, causing outbreaks that are difficult to control. Many outbreaks have been investigated retrospectively to study the possible routes of inter-human virus transmission. The results of these studies are often inconclusive and at the same time data from controlled experiments is sparse. Therefore, fundamental knowledge on transmission routes that could be used to improve intervention strategies is still missing. We here present an overview of the available data from experimental and observational studies on the transmission routes of respiratory viruses between humans, identify knowledge gaps, and discuss how the available knowledge is currently implemented in isolation guidelines in health care settings.

Indexed as

AerosolsDisease OutbreaksHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanMeasles virusObservational Studies as TopicRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesVirus DiseasesAerosols

Identifiers

PMID29452994
PMCPMC7102683
OpenAlexW2786432367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.