Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29452645›Full record

ReviewClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2018

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Esophageal Diseases.

Craig C Reed, Evan S Dellon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. Calculating the minimally important difference for the FACT-E from esophageal cancer surgery to recovery using distribution-based methods.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Benign Esophageal Disorders.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. A Conceptual Approach to Understanding Treatment Response in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Craig C ReedCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Evan S DellonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: edellon@med.unc.edu.

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
Budesonide versus fluticasone for treatment of eosinophilic esophagitisR01DK101856 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DELLON, EVAN SAMUEL · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK101856NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresEsophageal DiseasesHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29452645
PMCPMC5847284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.