ReviewBMC cancer2018
Fertility preservation healthcare circuit and networks in cancer patients worldwide: what are the issues?
Review in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coordinating Fertility Preservation in Children and Young Adults at Risk of Treatment-Induced Infertility: A Commentary.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Piperine protects ovarian follicles and stromal cells against doxorubicin-induced adverse effects in mouse ovaries.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Article
- Fertility Preservation in Female Patients with Cancer Part II: Royan Institute Clinical Practice Guideline for Girls and Women with Cancer; A Review Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2025Article
- Fertility Preservation in Postpubertal Males Undergoing Cancer Treatment in a Middle-Income Country: Is it Possible Despite the Barriers?Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Fertility Preservation in Female Patients with Cancer. Part I: Challenges and Future Prospects in Developing Countries; A Narrative Review Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2024Review
- Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Outcomes of Fertility Preservation for Female Cancer Patients in a Single Tertiary Center.Yonsei medical journal · 2023Article
- Awareness and perceptions of Filipino obstetrician-gynecologists on fertility preservation: a cross-sectional survey.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Perceptions and attitudes of medical oncologists regarding fertility preservation and pregnancy in high-risk cancer patients: A survey among Canadian medical oncologists.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Health Practitioners towards Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients in an Environmental Region of Saudi Arabia.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- Fertility preservation in boys: recent developments and new insightsHuman reproduction open · 2020Article
- The Development of an International Oncofertility Competency Framework: A Model to Increase Oncofertility Implementation.The oncologist · 2019Article
- Utilisation of Cryopreserved Gametes in Cancer Patients who Underwent Fertility Preservation.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFertility preservation (FP) is a major determinant of quality of life after cancer remission for women who may not have achieved their ideal family size. This article describes the FP services and strategy currently available, highlighting issues of oncofertility worldwide. For these patients in complex situations, health networks are essential to improve coordination of care, and the strengthening of this coordination is a major challenge to improve the performance of the health system. Two international networks have been created in order to foster scientific exchange between countries and to standardize the oncofertility healthcare circuit. However, the paucity of referral nationwide networks lead to a structural gap in health care policies. SHORT
conclusionManagement strategies of oncofertility in the world are still fragile and uneven. To structure the oncofertility sector, a multidisciplinary project allowing teams to collaborate is of utmost importance particularly in low and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.