Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29452356›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2018

Baseline anticholinergic burden from medications predicts incident fatal and non-fatal stroke in the EPIC-Norfolk general population.

David T Gamble, Allan B Clark, Robert N Luben, Nicholas J Wareham, Kay-Tee Khaw, Phyo K Myint

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David T GambleAgeing Clinical & Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Allan B ClarkNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Robert N LubenClinical Gerontology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Nicholas J WarehamMRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Kay-Tee KhawClinical Gerontology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Phyo K MyintAgeing Clinical & Experimental Research (ACER) Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBMRC Epidemiology Unit · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14136Medical Research Council G1000143Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1Medical Research Council MR/N003284/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke is primarily a disease of older age, with a substantial impact on global mortality and morbidity. Medications with anticholinergic effects are widely used, but no studies have been conducted to examine the relationship between anticholinergic burden (ACB) and stroke in a general population. Method: The sample was drawn from the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. Baseline assessments were carried out during 1993-97 and participants were followed up until March 2016. Participants were divided into four groups according to their total ACB score at baseline; these groups were those with a total ACB score of 0, 1, 2-3 and >3. After exclusion, Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to determine the associations between the ACB score groups and the risk of incident stroke and stroke mortality. Sensitivity analysis and propensity score matched analyses were performed. Results: In total 25 639 participants attended the first health check; 3917 participants were excluded, leaving 21 722 participants to be included. Participants had a mean age [standard deviation (SD)] of 58.9 (9.2) years (54.4% women). Of these, 2131 suffered incident stroke and 562 died from stroke. Mean follow-up was approximately 18 years for both outcomes. In the fully adjusted model, those with an ACB of >3 had 59% relative risk of incident stroke {hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59 [1.34-1.89]} and 86% relative risk of stroke mortality [1.86 (1.37-2.53)] compared with those in ACB 0 category. Sensitivity analyses and propensity score matched analyses showed similar results. Conclusions: Our results provide an incentive for the cautious use of medications with anticholinergic properties, to help reduce the global burden of stroke.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCholinergic AntagonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeUnited KingdomCholinergic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID29452356
PMCPMC6198932
OpenAlexW2778728120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.