ReviewCurrent eye research2018
Review of Literature on Measurements of Non-invasive Break Up Times, Lipid Morphology and Tear Meniscal Height Using Commercially Available Hand-held Instruments.
Review in Current eye research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Study on Tear Meniscus Height Inter-Eye Differences in Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Diagnosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The tale of an eroded strip - The tearscope conundrum.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Categorization of the Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye by a Cut-Off Criterion of TMH Measured with Tearscope.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dry eye disease and tear film assessment through a novel non-invasive ocular surface analyzer: The OSA protocol.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose/aims: Dry eye is a common multi-factorial disease characterized by tearfilm dysfunction. Diagnosis of dry eye requires documentation of tear status with non-invasive tear break up times (NIBUT), tear meniscal height (TMH), and tearfilm lipid layer. These parameters objectively assess tear stability and indirectly, the functional impact of meibomian gland dysfunction. While it is obvious that portable instrumentation gives broader access than fixed instrumentation, its value would be limited if it is unreliable and its precision and accuracy substantially worse than fixed instruments. MATERIALS/
methodsBecause of the lack of systematic reviews concerning the Tearscope, we performed a scoping review of the literature to determine 1. the ranges of the tear parameters as measured by the device, 2. relationship between these measurements and other clinical variables, 3. Information about intra or inter-observer agreement, and comparison with another technique, where available.
resultsWe found 22 reports related to NIBUT, 18 reports concerning tearfilm lipid morphology (LM) based on classification of interference patterns, and 8 reports on TMH. While publication of these reports indicates an acceptance of the reliability of portable instruments, we interrogated these studies further to evaluate the results obtained from portable devices and found that there was no equivalent measurements in fixed devices (LM) or measurements differ considerably from fixed devices (NIBUT). In the case of TMH, portable measurements were similar to those by traditional slit-lamp microscopy. There were relatively few studies on TMH measured using handheld devices, but it was found to be correlated to NIBUT but not the Schirmer test values.
conclusionsImaging algorithms in portable tearfilm instruments should be further standardized to facilitate wider adoption and evaluation. In the next few years, new emerging technologies will employ a strategy of non-invasive tear testing that is portable and relatively inexpensive, and these will enhance adoption of such tools in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.