Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29451900›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The ARID1A, p53 and ß-Catenin statuses are strong prognosticators in clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary and the endometrium.

Marlene Heckl, Elisa Schmoeckel, Linda Hertlein, Miriam Rottmann, Udo Jeschke, Doris Mayr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. SMARCA4 loss irrelevant forGynecologic oncology reports · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marlene HecklInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4295-3689
Elisa SchmoeckelInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7199-3837
Linda HertleinDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Miriam RottmannMunich Cancer Registry (MCR) of the Munich Tumour Centre (TZM), Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Udo JeschkeDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Doris MayrInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ARID1A, p53, p21, p16 and ß-Catenin in endometrioid and clear cell ovarian and endometrial carcinomas. MATERIALS AND

methods97 tumors were available for analysis of ARID1A, p53, p21, p16 and ß-Catenin with the techniques of tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry. 32 were ovarian carcinomas and 65 were endometrial carcinomas.

resultsEndometrioid ovarian carcinomas showed negative staining for ARID1A (a) and p21 (b), aberrant expression of p53 (c) and p16 (d) and ß-Catenin positive nuclear expression (e) respectively in 19% (a), 100% (b), 28.6% (c), 52.4% (d) and 4.8% (e) of all cases. In the group of clear cell ovarian carcinomas it was 63.6% (a), 100% (b), 81.8% (c), 54.5% (d) and 0% (e). For endometrioid uterine carcinomas it was 75.7% (a), 94.9% (b), 30.5% (c), 52.1% (d) and 6.8% (e) and for clear cell uterine carcinomas it was 8.6% (a), 100% (b), 50% (c), 100% (d) and 0% (e). Survival analysis showed that negative expression of ARID1A, p53 aberrant expression and ß-Catenin nuclear positive staining are independent negative prognosticators in both, clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma, regardless of ovarian or uterine origin. Cox-Regression analysis showed them again as negative prognostic factors. Furthermore, we found a significant correlation between ARID1A and ß-Catenin expression in endometrioid uterine tumors.

conclusionThe analyzed gynaecological carcinoma showed a distinct expression scheme of proteins that are associated with tumor suppression. We may conclude that ARID1A, p53 and ß-Catenin are the strongest prognostic factors by analyzing a subgroup of tumor suppressor genes in clear cell and endometrioid subtypes of ovarian and endometrial cancer and may be used along with traditional morphological and clinical characteristics for prognosis.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellAdultAgedAged, 80 and overbeta CateninBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDNA-Binding ProteinsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNuclear ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsARID1A protein, humanbeta CateninBiomarkers, TumorCTNNB1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsNuclear ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID29451900
PMCPMC5815611
OpenAlexW2786156977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.