ArticlePloS one2018
Ecogeography of teosinte.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid origin and phenotype evolution of the modern maize.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Achieving High-Density and Stress-Resilient Maize Breeding Via Germplasm Innovation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- An ancient origin of the naked grains of maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Diversity in Lowland and Highland Maize Landraces From Southern South America: Population Genetics Insights to Assist Conservation.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Nutrient and Microbiome-Mediated Plant-Soil Feedback in Domesticated and Wild Andropogoneae: Implications for Agroecosystems.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Fluctuation of ecological niches and geographic range shifts along chile pepper's domestication gradient.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Ecogeography ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- QTL mapping for flowering time in a maize-teosinte population under well-watered and water-stressed conditions.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2023Article
- Flourish with the wild.Nature plants · 2023Article
- Genomic diversity and population structure of teosinte (Zea spp.) and its conservation implications.PloS one · 2023Article
- Allele-specific Expression Reveals Multiple Paths to Highland Adaptation in Maize.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Genome sequencing reveals evidence of adaptive variation in the genus Zea.Nature genetics · 2022Article
- Incorporating evolutionary and threat processes into crop wild relatives conservation.Nature communications · 2022Article
- How hungry roots get their microbes.eLife · 2022Article
- Distribution and Climatic Adaptation of Wild Tomato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Water stress resilient cereal crops: Lessons from wild relatives.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2022Review
- Ecological and human dimensions of avocado expansion in México: Towards supply-chain sustainability.Ambio · 2022Review
- Domestication reshaped the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in a maize landrace compared to its wild relative, teosinte.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Selective sorting of ancestral introgression in maize and teosinte along an elevational cline.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Maize biochemistry in response to root herbivory was mediated by domestication, spread, and breeding.Planta · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptation of crops to climate change has motivated an increasing interest in the potential value of novel traits from wild species; maize wild relatives, the teosintes, harbor traits that may be useful to maize breeding. To study the ecogeographic distribution of teosinte we constructed a robust database of 2363 teosinte occurrences from published sources for the period 1842-2016. A geographical information system integrating 216 environmental variables was created for Mexico and Central America and was used to characterize the environment of each teosinte occurrence site. The natural geographic distribution of teosinte extends from the Western Sierra Madre of the State of Chihuahua, Mexico to the Pacific coast of Nicaragua and Costa Rica, including practically the entire western part of Mesoamerica. The Mexican annuals Zea mays ssp. parviglumis and Zea mays ssp. mexicana show a wide distribution in Mexico, while Zea diploperennis, Zea luxurians, Zea perennis, Zea mays ssp. huehuetenangensis, Zea vespertilio and Zea nicaraguensis had more restricted and distinct ranges, representing less than 20% of the total occurrences. Only 11.2% of teosinte populations are found in Protected Natural Areas in Mexico and Central America. Ecogeographical analysis showed that teosinte can cope with extreme levels of precipitation and temperatures during growing season. Modelling teosinte geographic distribution demonstrated congruence between actual and potential distributions; however, some areas with no occurrences appear to be within the range of adaptation of teosintes. Field surveys should be prioritized to such regions to accelerate the discovery of unknown populations. Potential areas for teosintes Zea mays ssp. mexicana races Chalco, Nobogame, and Durango, Zea mays ssp. huehuetenangensis, Zea luxurians, Zea diploperennis and Zea nicaraguensis are geographically separated; however, partial overlapping occurs between Zea mays ssp. parviglumis and Zea perennis, between Zea mays ssp. parviglumis and Zea diploperennis, and between Zea mays ssp. mexicana race Chalco and Zea mays ssp. mexicana race Central Plateau. Assessing priority of collecting for conservation showed that permanent monitoring programs and in-situ conservation projects with participation of local farmer communities are critically needed; Zea mays ssp. mexicana (races Durango and Nobogame), Zea luxurians, Zea diploperennis, Zea perennis and Zea vespertilio should be considered as the highest priority taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.