Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29451881›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Population-based coverage survey results following the mass drug administration of azithromycin for the treatment of trachoma in Amhara, Ethiopia.

Tigist Astale, Eshetu Sata, Mulat Zerihun, Andrew W Nute, Aisha E P Stewart, Demelash Gessese, Gedefaw Ayenew, Berhanu Melak, Melsew Chanyalew, Zerihun Tadesse and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tigist AstaleTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-2754
Eshetu SataTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mulat ZerihunTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Andrew W NuteTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Aisha E P StewartTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Demelash GesseseTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gedefaw AyenewTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Berhanu MelakTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Melsew ChanyalewHealth Promotion and Disease Prevention Core Process, The Amhara Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Zerihun TadesseTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
E Kelly CallahanTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Scott D NashTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
The Carter Center · ETCarter Center · USAmhara Regional Health Bureau · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrachoma is the leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. In communities where the district level prevalence of trachomatous inflammation-follicular among children ages 1-9 years is ≥5%, WHO recommends annual mass drug administration (MDA) of antibiotics with the aim of at least 80% coverage. Population-based post-MDA coverage surveys are essential to understand the effectiveness of MDA programs, yet published reports from trachoma programs are rare.

methodsIn the Amhara region of Ethiopia, a population-based MDA coverage survey was conducted 3 weeks following the 2016 MDA to estimate the zonal prevalence of self-reported drug coverage in all 10 administrative zones. Survey households were selected using a multi-stage cluster random sampling design and all individuals in selected households were presented with a drug sample and asked about taking the drug during the campaign. Zonal estimates were weighted and confidence intervals were calculated using survey procedures. Self-reported drug coverage was then compared with regional reported administrative coverage.

resultsRegion-wide, 24,248 individuals were enumerated, of which, 20,942 (86.4%) individuals were present. The regional self-reported antibiotic coverage was 76.8% (95%Confidence Interval (CI):69.3-82.9%) in the population overall and 77.4% (95%CI = 65.7-85.9%) among children ages 1-9 years old. Zonal coverage ranged from 67.8% to 90.2%. Five out of 10 zones achieved a coverage >80%. In all zones, the reported administrative coverage was greater than 90% and was considerably higher than self-reported MDA coverage. Main reasons reported for MDA campaign non-attendance included being physically unable to get to MDA site (22.5%), traveling (20.6%), and not knowing about the campaign (21.0%). MDA refusal was low (2.8%) in this population.

conclusionsAlthough self-reported MDA coverage in Amhara was greater than 80% in some zones, programmatic improvements are warranted throughout Amhara to achieve higher coverage. These results will be used to enhance community mobilization and improve training for MDA distributors and supervisors to improve coverage in future MDAs.

Indexed as

Mass Drug AdministrationPopulation HealthAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisAzithromycinChildChild, PreschoolChlamydia trachomatisEthiopiaFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID29451881
PMCPMC5833287
OpenAlexW2789231654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.