Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29451834›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Influenza vaccination 2014-2015: Results of a survey conducted among general practitioners in Italy.

Miriam Levi, Paolo Bonanni, Marco Biffino, Michele Conversano, Maria Corongiu, Paolo Morato, Tommasa Maio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding Primary Care Physician Vaccination Behaviour: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The issue of vaccine refusal: the study of a risky behavior.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miriam Levia Department of Health Sciences , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0086-3952
Paolo Bonannia Department of Health Sciences , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2875-3744
Marco Biffinob CeRIMP - Regional Centre for Occupational Diseases and Injuries, Local Health Unit Tuscany Centre , Florence , Italy.
Michele Conversanoc Department of Prevention of Taranto , Taranto Local Health Unit , Taranto , Italy.
Maria Corongiud Italian Federation of General Practitioners (Federazione Italiana Medici di Medicina Generale, FIMMG) , Rome , Italy.
Paolo Moratod Italian Federation of General Practitioners (Federazione Italiana Medici di Medicina Generale, FIMMG) , Rome , Italy.
Tommasa Maiod Italian Federation of General Practitioners (Federazione Italiana Medici di Medicina Generale, FIMMG) , Rome , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of the present study was to evaluate orientation, organizational procedures implemented and difficulties faced by general practitioners (GPs) during the 2014/15 seasonal influenza vaccination programme, as well as GPs' general attitude towards vaccinations.

methodsAn ad hoc online survey was developed and administered to general practitioners members of the Italian Federation of GPs (Federazione Italiana Medici di Medicina Generale - FIMMG). Overall, 10,000 survey invitations were sent. Data were analysed with R 3.3.2 software for analyses. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated in univariable and multivariable analyses.

resultsA sample of 1,245 GPs participated in the survey. Only slightly more than one third achieved a vaccination coverage comprised between 61% and 75%. In over half of the cases, the local health unit does not allow the GPs to choose the type of vaccine; 8.8% did not receive operational information at the beginning of the vaccination campaign and almost half did not receive feedback information at the end of the campaign. Almost three quarters reported that the vaccination uptake should increase. One tenth of GPs totally disagreed with the statement that vaccinating healthcare workers is crucial to prevent and control infections, and one fifth had not been vaccinated in the prior decade. DISCUSSION: The efforts made to vaccinate elderly individuals did not reach the expected results; still many GPs complained about lack of information by the relevant public health institutions and organizational difficulties. A stronger commitment of public health authorities would entail a higher vaccination uptake.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelVaccination CoverageAdultAgedFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesItalyMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesInfluenza Vaccineselderlygeneral practitionerInfluenzaItalyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID29451834
PMCPMC6037480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.