Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29451429›Full record

ReviewPain management2018

Perceived injustice in chronic pain: an examination through the lens of predictive processing.

Daniel A Bissell, Maisa S Ziadni, John A Sturgeon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An exploration of the relationship between perceived injustice and pain severity in breast cancer survivors: a structural equation model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel A BissellDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Maisa S ZiadniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
John A SturgeonDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

Funding

Stanford CAM Center for Chronic Back PainP01AT006651 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2011 to 2018
$8.2M
Interdisciplinary Research Training in Pain and Substance Use DisordersT32DA035165 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SEAN C MACKEY · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT006651NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA035165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain conditions have been shown to be exacerbated by psychological factors, and a better understanding of these factors can inform clinical practice and improve the efficacy of interventions. The current paper investigates perceived injustice, a novel psychosocial construct, within a framework influenced by the tenets of predictive processing. The proposed conceptual model derived from tenets of predictive processing yields a single hierarchical self-reconfiguring system driven by prediction, which accounts for a wide range of human experiences such as perception, behavior, learning and emotion. This conceptualization can inform the development and implementation of more targeted therapeutic interventions for chronic pain.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalPain PerceptionAdaptation, PsychologicalChronic PainEmotionsHumansPain Managementchronic painexpectanciesgoal-oriented behaviorperceived injusticepredictive processingpsychological factors

Identifiers

PMID29451429
PMCPMC6123883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.