Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29451396›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of radiology2018

Vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB) excision of subcentimeter microcalcifications as an alternative to open biopsy for atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Simone Schiaffino, Elena Massone, Licia Gristina, Piero Fregatti, Giuseppe Rescinito, Alessandro Villa, Daniele Friedman, Massimo Calabrese

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simone Schiaffino1 Department of Radiology, University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4243-888X
Elena Massone1 Department of Radiology, University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy.
Licia Gristina1 Department of Radiology, University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy.
Piero Fregatti2 Department of Surgery, Policlinico San Martino , Genoa , Italy.
Giuseppe Rescinito3 Department of Radiology, Policlinico San Martino , Genoa , Italy.
Alessandro Villa4 Department of Radiology, Ospedale San Bartolomeo , Sarzana , Italy.
Daniele Friedman2 Department of Surgery, Policlinico San Martino , Genoa , Italy.
Massimo Calabrese1 Department of Radiology, University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAtypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a proliferative lesion associated with a variable increased risk of breast malignancy, but the management of the patients is still not completely defined, with mandatory surgical excision in most cases. To report the results of the conservative management with mammographic checks of patients with ADH diagnosed by vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB), without residual calcifications.

methodsThe authors accessed the institutional database of radiological, surgical and pathological anatomy. Inclusion criteria were: ADH diagnosed by VAB on a single group of microcalcifications, without residual post-procedure; follow-up at least of 12 months. Exclusion criteria were the presence of personal history of breast cancer or other high-risk lesions; association with other synchronous lesions, both more and less advanced proliferative lesions.

resultsThe 65 included patients were all females, with age range of 40-79 years (mean 54 years). The maximum diameter range of the groups of microcalcifications was 4-11 mm (mean 6.2 mm), all classified as BI-RADS 4b (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4b) and defined as fine pleomorphic in 29 cases (45%) or amorphous in 36 cases (55%). The range of follow-up length was 12-156 months (mean 67 months). Only one patients developed new microcalcifications, in the same breast, 48 months after and 15 mm from the first VAB, interpreted as low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at surgical excision.

conclusionThese results could justify the conservative management, in a selected group of patients, being the malignancy rate lower than 2%, considered in the literature as the "probably benign" definition. Advances in knowledge: Increasing the length of follow-up of selected patients conservatively managed can improve the management of ADH cases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsCalcinosisCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMammographyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVacuum

Identifiers

PMID29451396
PMCPMC6190792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.