Common bile duct cannulation in the left lateral position during ERCP.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Positioning During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Procedures: A Comparison Between Semi-Prone- and Prone-Positioned Patients.Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates
   Trial
2. Does patient's position count during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography? Left lateral decubitus versus prone position.Pakistan journal of medical sciences
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The efficacy and safety of the left lateral position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as