Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29450973›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2018

Difference between renal and splenic resistive index as a novel criterion in Doppler evaluation of renal artery stenosis.

Clemens Grupp, Michael J Koziolek, Manuel Wallbach, Kerstin Hoxhold, Gerhard A Müller, Carsten Bramlage

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Renal resistive index in hypertensive patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Renal artery stenosis in China: The state of changes.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Article
  7. Renal resistive index for renovascular hypertension: In the quest of the Holy Grail.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clemens GruppDepartment of Nephrology & Rheumatology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4300-5293
Michael J KoziolekDepartment of Nephrology & Rheumatology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Manuel WallbachDepartment of Nephrology & Rheumatology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Kerstin HoxholdDepartment of Nephrology & Rheumatology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Gerhard A MüllerDepartment of Nephrology & Rheumatology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Carsten BramlageDepartment of Nephrology & Rheumatology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS) using Doppler is difficult to evaluate, particularly under conditions such as bilateral RAS or difficultly accessible renal arteries (RA). The objective of the present study was to assess the utility of splenic arterial compared to renal flow as an additional parameter in the Doppler evaluation of RAS. The difference between the resistive indices (RI) determined in renal and splenic parenchymal arteries (ΔRI

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionChildFemaleHumansHypertensionKidneyMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedRenal Artery ObstructionSpleenUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorYoung Adultbilateral renal artery stenosisduplexflow profilesrenovascular hypertensionsingle kidneyultrasound diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID29450973
PMCPMC8031111
OpenAlexW2794282035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.