ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2018
Semiempirical configuration interaction calculations for ru-centered dyes.
Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational investigation of the photochemical properties of transition-metal-centered dyes typically involves optimization of the molecular structure followed by calculation of the UV/visible spectrum. At present, these steps are usually carried out using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT calculations. Recently, we demonstrated that semiempirical methods with appropriate parameterization could yield geometries that were in very good agreement with DFT calculations, allowing large sets of molecules to be screened quickly and efficiently. In this article, we modify a configuration interaction (CI) method based on a semiempirical PM6 Hamiltonian to determine the UV/visible absorption spectra of Ru-centered complexes. Our modification to the CI method is based on a scaling of the two-center, two-electron Coulomb integrals. This modified, PM6-based method shows a significantly better match to the experimental absorption spectra versus the default configuration interaction method (in MOPAC) on a training set of 13 molecules. In particular, the modified PM6 method blue-shifts the location of the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) peaks, in better agreement with experimental and DFT-based computational results, correcting a significant deficiency of the unmodified method. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.