Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29450794›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2018

Association Between Obstetric Provider's Advice and Gestational Weight Gain.

Andrea Lopez-Cepero, Katherine Leung, Tiffany Moore Simas, Milagros C Rosal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring weight bias internalization in pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea Lopez-CeperoClinical and Population Health Research Program, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA.
Katherine LeungDivision of Research, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA.
Tiffany Moore SimasDivision of Research, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA.
Milagros C RosalDivision of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue, S7-755, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA. Milagros.Rosal@UMassMed.edu.

Funding

University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000161 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2012 to 2015
$11.0M
UMass Center for Health Equity Intervention ResearchP60MD006912 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI ALLISON, JEROAN J · 2012 to 2016
$6.8M
Enhancing the success of underrepresented students in the biomedical sciencesR25GM113686 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LAPANE, KATE L, LEWIS, BRIAN C · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
CDC HHS U48 DP001933NIGMS NIH HHS 5 R25 GM113686-02NIH HHS UL1TR000161NIMHD NIH HHS 1 P60 MD006912-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study examined associations between pregnant women's report of obstetric provider GWG advice, self-reported adherence to such advice, and GWG. Methods Healthy pregnant women (N = 91) who started obstetric care prior to 17 weeks of gestation completed assessments between 30 and 34 weeks of gestation. These included survey (questions on receipt of and adherence to provider GWG advice, and demographics) and anthropometric measures. GWG data were abstracted from electronic health records. Analyses included Chi square and Mann-Whitney tests, and binary and multivariate logistic regressions. Results The cohort's median age was 28 years, 68% of women were White, 78% had a college education, 50.5% were overweight or obese before the pregnancy, and 62.6% had GWGs above the Institute of Medicine-recommended ranges. Sixty-seven percent of women reported having received GWG advice from their obstetric providers and, of those, 54.1% reported that they followed their provider's advice. Controlling for race, education and pre-pregnancy BMI, receipt of GWG advice was marginally associated with increased odds of excessive weight gain (OR 2.52, CI 0.89-7.16). However, women that reported following the advice had lower odds of excessive GWG (OR 0.18, CI 0.03-0.91) and, on average, gained 11.3 pounds less than those who reported following the advice somewhat or not at all. Conclusions Frequency of GWG advice from obstetric providers is less than optimal. When given and followed, provider advice may reduce the risk of excessive GWG. Research to understand factors that facilitate providers GWG advice giving and women's adherence to providers' advice, and to develop interventions to optimize both, is needed.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainPatient ComplianceAdultCounselingFemaleHumansMassachusettsObesityPatient Education as TopicPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareProspective StudiesGestational weight gainPregnancyProvider advice

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.