ArticleIrish journal of medical science2018
Mortality rates of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in an Irish university teaching hospital.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- 30-Day mortality risk predictors for emergency laparotomy: a comparative study.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- Perioperative mortality and its predictors among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at selected southern Ethiopian governmental hospitals, 2022: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmergency laparotomy (EL) is a commonly performed operation with increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is a lack of published outcomes following emergency laparotomy within an Irish population. The aim of this study was to assess our outcomes and compare these to predefined outcomes from NELA.
methodsA review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent an emergency laparotomy between January 1st 2015 and October 31st 2016 was performed. Patient demographics, operative indication and procedures, preoperative lactate, time of surgery, admission to high dependency unit (HDU) and mortality (30- and 90-day mortality) were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab V18 with p < 0.05 considered significant.
resultsOne hundred twenty-four emergency operations were performed on 120 patients. The median age was 60 years. Indications for surgery included the following (%): peritonitis (32.45%), obstruction (22.5%), complicated hernia (19.1%), mesenteric ischaemia (15%), trauma (4.1%), and acute haemorrhage (3.3%). A consultant surgeon and consultant anaesthetist were present at 79 and 78% of EL carried out, respectively. Reported 30- and 90-day mortality were 6.66 and 11.6%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 20% in octogenarians. Index lactate did not correlate with mortality (p = 0.43). A significant proportion of mortalities had procedures carried out between 6 pm and midnight with the highest mortality rate in patients with mesenteric ischaemia (p < 0.05).
conclusionEL is associated with high mortality rates. Our mortality figures compare favourably with the NELA data. We support the development of a national database to facilitate improvements in the quality of care delivered to this high-risk cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.