SynthesisCurrent allergy and asthma reports2018
Social Factors in the Development of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: a Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and influencing factors associated with chronic rhinosinusitis among healthcare trainees and professionals in Hail, Saudi Arabia: a principal component analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Relationship between chronic rhinosinusitis and risk of obstructive sleep apnea.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Socioeconomic status impacts postoperative productivity loss and health utility changes in refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2019Article
- Socioeconomic factors impact quality of life outcomes and olfactory measures in chronic rhinosinusitis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2019Article
- Current opinions for the management of asthma associated with ear, nose and throat comorbidities.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2018Review
- Serum metabolic biomarkers associated with self-reported chronic rhinosinusitis: a population-based cross-sectional study from the KNHANES.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn an era where prevention is paramount, understanding social factors for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may facilitate preventive interventions that mitigate risk factors associated with the initiation or progression of the disease. RECENT
findingsBoth passive and active smoking are clearly and unequivocally associated with both the incidence and the severity of rhinosinusitis, while there an increasing body of evidence linking social deprivation and low socioeconomic status with rhinosinusitis and its complications. However, overall, only a handful of studies were longitudinal, while the available studies suffer from lack of standardized definitions of rhinosinusitis. In this systematic review, we assessed the available evidence linking CRS with social factors, such as socioeconomic status and class, educational status, family status, living and working location and conditions, and use of toxins or recreational drugs as well as exercise and diet. Thirty studies from 1995 onwards fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were used for this review. Social deprivation and low socioeconomic level seem to be directly associated with rhinosinusitis, as there are pollutants in living or working environment. A clear and direct association between smoking (both active and passive) and rhinosinusitis was also shown. However, the link between rhinosinusitis and education level, and exercise and diet, if any, seems to be more complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29450659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.