Observational studyDiabetologia2018
Pharmacogenomics in diabetes: outcomes of thiamine therapy in TRMA syndrome.
Observational study in Diabetologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Endemic Region of Thiamine-Responsive Megaloblastic Anemia Caused by anInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anemia syndrome with novel compound heterozygous SLC19A2 mutations and thrombotic events: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Early thiamine therapy in Rogers syndrome: Systematic review of hematologic, auditory and glycemic outcomes.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Thiamine-Responsive Megaloblastic Anemia Syndrome: A Rare Syndromic Cause of Diabetes in Childhood.Indian pediatrics · 2025Article
- The role of SLC19A2 variants in the wide spectrum of non-autoimmune abnormalities of glucose homeostasis.Diabetologia · 2025Article
- Neonatal diabetes mellitus around the world: Update 2024.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Review
- Precision treatment of beta-cell monogenic diabetes: a systematic review.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Incidence, Phenotypes, and Genotypes of Neonatal Diabetes: A 16-Year Experience. The Rare Genetic Etiologies of Neonatal Diabetes Are Common in Sudan.Pediatric diabetes · 2024Article
- An Italian case series' description of thiamine responsive megaloblastic anemia syndrome: importance of early diagnosis and treatment.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Systematic Review of Treatment of Beta-Cell Monogenic Diabetes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- The Impacts of Slc19a3 Deletion and Intestinal SLC19A3 Insertion on Thiamine Distribution and Brain Metabolism in the Mouse.Metabolites · 2023Article
- ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: The diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents.Pediatric diabetes · 2022Article
- Importance of Immediate Thiamine Therapy in Children with Suspected Thiamine-Responsive Megaloblastic Anemia-Report on Two Patients Carrying a NovelJournal of pediatric genetics · 2022Article
- Clinical features, biochemistry, and HLA-DRB1 status in youth-onset type 1 diabetes in Sudan.Pediatric diabetes · 2021Article
- Case Report: Genetic and Clinical Features of Maternal Uniparental Isodisomy-Induced Thiamine-Responsive Megaloblastic Anemia Syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Type 1 diabetes genetic risk score discriminates between monogenic and Type 1 diabetes in children diagnosed at the age of <5 years in the Iranian population.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2019Article
- Whole exome sequencing identifies a new mutation in the SLC19A2 gene leading to thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anemia in an Egyptian family.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019Article
- Pancytopenia in an adult patient with thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anaemia.BMJ case reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 14 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisDiabetes is one of the cardinal features of thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anaemia (TRMA) syndrome. Current knowledge of this rare monogenic diabetes subtype is limited. We investigated the genotype, phenotype and response to thiamine (vitamin B
methodsWe studied 32 individuals with biallelic SLC19A2 mutations identified by Sanger or next generation sequencing. Clinical details were collected through a follow-up questionnaire.
resultsWe identified 24 different mutations, of which nine are novel. The onset of the first TRMA symptom ranged from birth to 4 years (median 6 months [interquartile range, IQR 3-24]) and median age at diabetes onset was 10 months (IQR 5-27). At presentation, three individuals had isolated diabetes and 12 had asymptomatic hyperglycaemia. Follow-up data was available for 15 individuals treated with thiamine for a median 4.7 years (IQR 3-10). Four patients were able to stop insulin and seven achieved better glycaemic control on lower insulin doses. These 11 patients were significantly younger at diabetes diagnosis (p = 0.042), at genetic testing (p = 0.01) and when starting thiamine (p = 0.007) compared with the rest of the cohort. All patients treated with thiamine became transfusion-independent and adolescents achieved normal puberty. There were no additional benefits of thiamine doses >150 mg/day and no reported side effects up to 300 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationIn TRMA syndrome, diabetes can be asymptomatic and present before the appearance of other features. Prompt recognition is essential as early treatment with thiamine can result in improved glycaemic control, with some individuals becoming insulin-independent. DATA AVAILABILITY: SLC19A2 mutation details have been deposited in the Decipher database ( https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.