Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29450538›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2018

Clinical Age-Specific Seasonal Conjunctivitis Patterns and Their Online Detection in Twitter, Blog, Forum, and Comment Social Media Posts.

Michael S Deiner, Stephen D McLeod, James Chodosh, Catherine E Oldenburg, Cherie A Fathy, Thomas M Lietman, Travis C Porco

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ophthalmology residency programs on social media.International ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Seasonal and Temporal Trends in Childhood Conjunctivitis in Burkina Faso.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael S DeinerFrancis I. Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States.
Stephen D McLeodFrancis I. Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States.
James ChodoshMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Catherine E OldenburgFrancis I. Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States.
Cherie A FathyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Brockton Signature Hospital, Brockton, Massachusetts, United States.
Thomas M LietmanFrancis I. Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States.
Travis C PorcoFrancis I. Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States.

Funding

Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAKKARAJU, APARNA · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
Immunopathogenesis of Adenovirus KeratitisR01EY013124 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI James Chodosh, Jaya Rajaiya · 2001 to 2026
$10.8M
The Brown Initiative in HIV and AIDS Clinical Research for Minority CommunitiesR25MH083620 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI NUNN, AMY STEWART · 2008 to 2025
$3.7M
Digital Detection of Infectious Eye EpidemicsR01EY024608 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIETMAN, THOMAS M · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013124NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024608NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH083620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to determine whether big data from social media might reveal seasonal trends of conjunctivitis, most forms of which are nonreportable. Methods: Social media posts (from Twitter, and from online forums and blogs) were classified by age and by conjunctivitis type (allergic or infectious) using Boolean and machine learning methods. Based on spline smoothing, we estimated the circular mean occurrence time (a measure of central tendency for occurrence) and the circular variance (a measure of uniformity of occurrence throughout the year, providing an index of seasonality). Clinical records from a large tertiary care provider were analyzed in a similar way for comparison. Results: Social media posts machine-coded as being related to infectious conjunctivitis showed similar times of occurrence and degree of seasonality to clinical infectious cases, and likewise for machine-coded allergic conjunctivitis posts compared to clinical allergic cases. Allergic conjunctivitis showed a distinctively different seasonal pattern than infectious conjunctivitis, with a mean occurrence time later in the spring. Infectious conjunctivitis for children showed markedly greater seasonality than for adults, though the occurrence times were similar; no such difference for allergic conjunctivitis was seen. Conclusions: Social media posts broadly track the seasonal occurrence of allergic and infectious conjunctivitis, and may be a useful supplement for epidemiologic monitoring.

Indexed as

BloggingElectronic Health RecordsSeasonsSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolConjunctivitis, AllergicConjunctivitis, BacterialConjunctivitis, ViralFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID29450538
PMCPMC5815847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.