Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29450486›Full record

Observational studyJAMA ophthalmology2018

Differentiating Acute and Subacute Vertical Strabismus Using Different Head Positions During the Upright-Supine Test.

João Lemos, Adnan Subei, Mário Sousa, César Nunes, Luís Cunha, Christopher Glisson, Eric Eggenberger

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

João LemosNeurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.
Adnan SubeiDepartment of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, Lansing.
Mário SousaNeurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.
César NunesNeuroradiology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.
Luís CunhaNeurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.
Christopher GlissonDepartment of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, Lansing.
Eric EggenbergerDepartment of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, Lansing.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Accurate clinical differentiation between skew deviation and fourth nerve palsy (4NP) is critical in the acute and subacute settings. Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the upright-supine test to detect vertical misalignment changes using different head positions for the diagnosis of acute or subacute skew deviation vs 4NP. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter study enrolled consecutive patients from Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal, and Michigan State University, Lansing, within 2 months of presenting with vertical diplopia and diagnosed as having skew deviation or acquired unilateral 4NP. The study used nonmasked screening and diagnostic test results from June 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: A 50% or greater change in vertical misalignment between the upright and supine positions, with the head centered and tilted to either side. Measurements included the alternate prism and cover (APC) test, the double Maddox rod test, the APC test change index ([measurement upright - measurement supine] / [measurement upright + measurement supine]), and the APC test sensitivity and specificity. Results: Of the 37 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 58 (14) years, and 26 (70%) were male. We enrolled 19 patients (51%) with skew deviation and 18 (49%) with 4NP. Eighteen patients with skew deviation (95%) showed additional ocular motor and/or neurological signs. When moving to the supine position, only 1 patient with skew deviation (5%) showed more than a 50% decrease of hypertropia with the head centered (APC test: sensitivity, 5%; specificity, 100%). Three patients with 4NP (17%) showed more than a 50% decrease of hypertropia with the head tilted toward the hypertropic eye, and 10 patients with 4NP (56%) showed more than a 50% increase of hypertropia with the head tilted toward the hypotropic eye. Change indexes were different between the skew deviation and 4NP groups for head tilt to the hypotropic eye (difference, -0.33 prism diopters; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.20; P < .001). Cyclotorsion worsened in the supine position only in patients with skew deviation (hypertropic eye: difference, -7.6 prism diopters; 95% CI, -13.00 to -0.75; P = .01; hypotropic eye: difference, 8.2 prism diopters; 95% CI, 0 to 15.75; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The upright-supine test with the head centered is not a sensitive method to separate acute or subacute skew deviation from 4NP. Conversion of an incomitant vertical deviation in the upright position to a comitant vertical strabismus in the supine position in all head positions, as well as the absence of additional ocular motor and/or neurologic signs, may constitute a more useful clue.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOculomotor MusclesProspective StudiesStrabismusSupine PositionTilt-Table TestTrochlear Nerve DiseasesVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID29450486
PMCPMC5876849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.