Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29450343›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of ophthalmology

Conjunctival autograft in pterygium treatment.

Sorin Simion Macarie, Daniela Mariana Macarie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sorin Simion MacarieDepartment of Ophthalmology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Daniela Mariana MacarieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Integrated Ambulatory, Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pterygium is characterized by the thickening of the bulbar conjunctiva and the invasion of the cornea from the sclerocorneal limbus to the central portion of the cornea. Pterygium produces corneal deformation, which extends toward the central portion of the cornea. The visual disorders depend on the corneal extent. The treatment goal is the removal of the corneal and conjunctival portion of the pterygium and the coverage of the resulting conjunctival defect. The association of the pterygium surgical excision was assessed with conjunctival autograft. For this purpose, a retrospective study was performed on 68 patients and was extended over 7 years (2009-2015). Patients with recurrent pterygium were excluded. The time for corneal re-epithelization and for the pain and photophobia disappearance was followed. The incidence of recurrence was also observed. Pain levels were assessed by using a 10-point visual analog linear scale (VAS). The mean time for ocular pain and photophobia disappearance was of 48 hours. The mean pain score was 3.38 at 24 hours after surgery. Corneal re-epithelialization was achieved in 60 hours after surgery. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients. It was concluded that pterygium surgical excision with conjunctival autograft is effective in pterygium surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAutograftsConjunctivaEpithelium, CornealFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPterygiumRe-EpithelializationRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcomeconjunctival autograftpterygiumpterygium managementpterygium recurrence

Identifiers

PMID29450343
PMCPMC5720130
OpenAlexW2977763113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.