ReviewRomanian journal of ophthalmology
Bevacizumab in the treatment of acute central/hemicentral retinal vein occlusions.
Review in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even if bevacizumab is unlicensed, a majority of retina specialists still currently recommends it in retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema. For the first time, the results of our studies showed evidence suggesting that an early treatment administered immediately after the onset of venous occlusion, provided a significant and sustained improvement in visual acuity and foveal thickness, with inactive disease (dry retina and stable visual acuity for at least 6 months after the last injection) in most phakic patients with acute central/ hemicentral retinal vein occlusions, making this treatment option a rational and viable therapeutic strategy. Central/ hemicentral retinal vein occlusion has to be considered an ophthalmic emergency. The highlighting of the ocular conditions most frequently associated with central/ hemicentral retinal vein occlusion (ocular hypertension, primary open angle glaucoma, primary angle closure suspect, primary angle closure, and primary angle closure glaucoma) is mandatory. Regardless of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents used (bevacizumab/ ranibizumab / aflibercept/), and regardless of the treatment approaches chosen (treat-and-extend/ pro re nata algorithm), the efficacy of therapy depends primarily on the precociousness of the therapy after the diagnosis of central/ hemicentral retinal vein occlusion. Any delay in the treatment will adversely influence the restoration of visual functions, which are difficult to correct even with subsequent treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29450339PMC5720126W2996784020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.