Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29450232›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2017

Predicting early onset of intoxication versus drinking-A population-based prospective study of Norwegian adolescents.

Frøydis Enstad, Willy Pedersen, Wendy Nilsen, Tilmann von Soest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frøydis EnstadDivision of Mental and Physical Health, Department of Child Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
Willy PedersenDepartment of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, PO Box 1096, Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway.
Wendy NilsenDivision of Mental and Physical Health, Department of Child Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
Tilmann von SoestDivision of Mental and Physical Health, Department of Child Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRecent research suggests that early onset of intoxication (EOI) may be of greater importance for a wide range of subsequent adverse outcomes than early drinking experiences without intoxication. However, research on antecedents of EOI is scarce. The present study identifies predictors of EOI and whether they differ from those of early onset of drinking (EOD).

methodsData was drawn from the prospective Tracking Opportunities and Problems (TOPP) study of Norwegian families (

findingsA variety of temperamental, socio-economic, and family factors predicted EOI, whereas EOD was predicted of substantially fewer variables. Particularly, when controlling for relevant covariates, low levels of shyness, own conduct problems and having friends with deviant behaviour prospectively predicted EOI, but not EOD.

conclusionsFuture research and prevention efforts should take into consideration that EOI and EOD without getting drunk appear to be predicted by different risk factors in childhood and adolescence.

Indexed as

AdolescentsAlcoholDrinkingIntoxicationOnsetPredictors

Identifiers

PMID29450232
PMCPMC5800584
OpenAlexW2605640994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.