ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels2014
Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for the presence of coronary artery ectasia in patients with aortic aneurysms.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in aortic disease: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2020Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth aortic aneurysms and coronary artery ectasia (CAE) frequently coexist and are associated with more pronounced inflammation. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NL ratio) is widely used as a marker of inflammation. However, relation between CAE and NL ratio in patients with aortic aneurysms is not fully understood. This study was undertaken to assess relation between CAE and NL ratio in patients with aortic aneurysms.
methodsThis study consisted of 93 consecutive patients with aortic aneurysms (AA group) and 79 patients without aortic aneurysms who had angiographically normal coronary arteries as the control group. Moreover, patients with aortic aneurysms were classified into two groups based on the presence of CAE; CAE (+) group (n = 44) and CAE (-) group (n = 49). We compared blood chemical parameters in both groups.
resultsIn the AA group, 44 patients (47.3%) had CAE. The AA group had a significantly higher NL ratio than the control group (2.93 ± 1.43 vs. 2.45 ± 1.05, p = 0.027). Furthermore, the CAE (+) group had a significantly higher NL ratio than the CAE (-) group (3.39 ± 1.67 vs. 2.52 ± 1.04, p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the high NL ratio was an independent predictor for CAE in patients with aortic aneurysms (odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.69, p = 0.001).
conclusionsPatients with aortic aneurysms had a significantly higher NL ratio than those without aortic aneurysms. Furthermore, the NL ratio might predict the presence of CAE in patients with aortic aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.