Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29450169›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels2014

Efficacy of non-compliant balloon post-dilation in optimization of contemporary stents: A digital stent enhancement study.

Jaya Chandrasekhar, Christopher Allada, Simon O'Connor, Moyazur Rahman, Bruce Shadbolt, Ahmad Farshid

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05292105 (NC Xperience Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05292105 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

NC Xperience Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Study

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación EPICRan2022 to 2023Enrolled59ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease (CAD), Ischemic Heart DiseaseArmsNC Xperience
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Contemporary Use of Post-Dilatation for Stent Optimization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Results From the Netherlands Heart Registration.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaya ChandrasekharDepartment of Cardiology, The Canberra Hospital, Australia.
Christopher AlladaDepartment of Cardiology, The Canberra Hospital, Australia.
Simon O'ConnorDepartment of Cardiology, The Canberra Hospital, Australia.
Moyazur RahmanDepartment of Cardiology, The Canberra Hospital, Australia.
Bruce ShadboltCentre for Advances in Epidemiology and Information Technology, The Canberra Hospital, Australia.
Ahmad FarshidDepartment of Cardiology, The Canberra Hospital, Australia.
Canberra Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no evidence from randomized trials for the benefit of routine non-compliant balloon (NCB) post-dilation after stent deployment. Despite being the gold standard, intravascular ultrasound is infrequently performed due to time and cost constraints and a suitable alternative technology is required for routine assessment of stent expansion. The purpose of this study was to assess the contribution of NCB post-dilation in optimizing contemporary stents by using digital stent enhancement (DSE).

methodsWe treated 120 patients with stent insertion and assessed the stents with DSE before and after NCB use. Optimal expansion was defined as the minimum stent diameter (MSD) ≥ 90% of the nominal stent diameter, an adaptation of the MUSIC and POSTIT trial criteria. Stent deployment was performed at 12 atm pressure followed by routine NCB post-dilation at ≥ 14 atm.

resultsThe mean reference diameter on QCA was 2.75 mm (SD 0.63) and mean stent diameter was 3.15 mm (SD 0.46). At a mean stent deployment pressure of 11.7 atm (SD 2.4), only 21% of stents were optimally expanded. After NCB inflation at a mean of 16.9 atm (SD 2.8), MSD increased by 0.26 mm (SD 0.24), optimal stent expansion increased from 21% to 58% and mean stent symmetry ratio increased from 0.83 to 0.87 (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsContemporary stents are sub-optimally expanded in the majority of cases after standard deployment compared with nominal sizes. Adjunctive NCB post-dilation optimized an additional 37% of stents. DSE analysis can assist in qualitative and quantitative stent assessments and can potentially facilitate a selective NCB post-dilation strategy to achieve optimal stent expansion.

Indexed as

Digital stent enhancementNon-compliant balloonOptimal stent deploymentPercutaneous coronary interventionQuantitative coronary angiographyStent expansion

Identifiers

PMID29450169
PMCPMC5801274
OpenAlexW2006506424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.