Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29450005›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2017

Designing in situ simulation in the emergency department: evaluating safety attitudes amongst physicians and nurses.

Charlotte Paltved, Anders Thais Bjerregaard, Kristian Krogh, Jonas Juul Pedersen, Peter Musaeus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte Paltved1Centre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders Thais Bjerregaard1Centre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kristian Krogh1Centre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jonas Juul Pedersen1Centre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter Musaeus1Centre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6062-055X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis intervention study aimed to enhance patient safety attitudes through the design of an in situ simulation program based on a needs analysis involving thematic analysis of patient safety data and short-term ethnography. The study took place at an Emergency Department (ED) in the Central Region of Denmark. Research suggests that poor handover communication can increase the likelihood of critical incidents and adverse events in the ED. Furthermore, simulation is an effective strategy for training handover communication skills. Research is lacking, however, on how to use patient safety data and a needs analysis to the design of in situ simulation communication training.

methodsThis is a prospective pre-post study investigating the interventional effects of in situ simulation. It used a three-pronged strategy: (1) thematic analysis of patient safety data consisting of reported critical incidents and adverse events, (2) a needs analysis based on short-term ethnography in the ED, and (3) pre-post evaluation using the validated Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Trainee Reactions Score.

resultsSixteen different healthcare teams participated composed by 9 physicians and 30 nurses. In the SAQ, participating staff scored their safety attitudes in six categories (

conclusionsThis study designed a feasible strategy for implementing in situ simulation based on a needs analysis of critical incidents and adverse events and short-term ethnography.

Indexed as

EducationEmergency medicine and first respondersIn situ simulationInterprofessional collaborative practice

Identifiers

PMID29450005
PMCPMC5806390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.