Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29449994›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2016

Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements.

Adam Cheng, David Kessler, Ralph Mackinnon, Todd P Chang, Vinay M Nadkarni, Elizabeth A Hunt, Jordan Duval-Arnould, Yiqun Lin, David A Cook, Martin Pusic and 5 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 152 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05630391 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Approach to the Coronavirus With Patient With High-Fidelity Simulation Training: A Mixed Method Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSakarya UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled52ConditionsSimulation of Physical Illness, SatisfactionArmsHigh-Fidelity Simulation Manikin, Education
NCT06472401 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Integrated Learning Support System Based on Immersive Simulated Training for Nursing Students: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BrasiliaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled95ConditionsSimulation Training, Learning, Educational Technology, NephrotoxicityArmsIntegrated Learning Support System, Standard Learning Model
NCT06677398 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Three Debriefing Methods in Virtual Patient Simulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiRan2024 to 2025Enrolled109ConditionsVirtual Patient, Debriefing Method, Nursing StudentArmsDebriefing Method 1, Debriefing Method VP, Debriefing Method 2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Adam Cheng1Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary KidSim-ASPIRE Research Program, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8 Canada.
David Kessler2Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY USA.
Ralph Mackinnon3Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Todd P Chang5Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Vinay M Nadkarni6The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA USA.
Elizabeth A Hunt7Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA.
Jordan Duval-Arnould7Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA.
Yiqun Lin8Alberta Children's Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Canada.
David A Cook9Multidisciplinary Simulation Center, Mayo Clinic Online Learning, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, USA.
Martin Pusic10Institute for Innovations in Medical Education, Division of Education Quality and Analytics, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY USA.
Joshua Hui11Department of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA.
David Moher12Ottawa Methods Centre, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario Canada.
Matthias Egger13Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marc Auerbach14Department of Pediatrics, Section of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA.
International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education (INSPIRE) Reporting Guidelines Investigators

Funding

THAPCA Trials - Scientific ApplicationU01HL094345 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MOLER, FRANK W · 2009 to 2016
$12.7M
HALF-PINT: Heart and Lung Failure - Pediatric INsulin Titration trial - CCCU01HL107681 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI AGUS, MICHAEL SD, NADKARNI, VINAY M · 2011 to 2016
$9.6M
BRAIN OXYGENATION AND METABOLISMR01HL058669 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PASTUSZKO, ANNA · 1999 to 2012
$4.4M
Coagulation and Fibrinolysis in Pediatric Insulin Titration TrialR01HL114484 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SAPRU, ANIL · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
AHRQ HHS R03 HS021583NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL058669NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114484NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL094345NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL107681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation-based research (SBR) is rapidly expanding but the quality of reporting needs improvement. For a reader to critically assess a study, the elements of the study need to be clearly reported. Our objective was to develop reporting guidelines for SBR by creating extensions to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statements.

methodsAn iterative multistep consensus-building process was used on the basis of the recommended steps for developing reporting guidelines. The consensus process involved the following: (1) developing a steering committee, (2) defining the scope of the reporting guidelines, (3) identifying a consensus panel, (4) generating a list of items for discussion via online premeeting survey, (5) conducting a consensus meeting, and (6) drafting reporting guidelines with an explanation and elaboration document.

resultsThe following 11 extensions were recommended for CONSORT: item 1 (title/abstract), item 2 (background), item 5 (interventions), item 6 (outcomes), item 11 (blinding), item 12 (statistical methods), item 15 (baseline data), item 17 (outcomes/ estimation), item 20 (limitations), item 21 (generalizability), and item 25 (funding). The following 10 extensions were recommended for STROBE: item 1 (title/abstract), item 2 (background/rationale), item 7 (variables), item 8 (data sources/measurement), item 12 (statistical methods), item 14 (descriptive data), item 16 (main results), item 19 (limitations), item 21 (generalizability), and item 22 (funding). An elaboration document was created to provide examples and explanation for each extension.

conclusionsWe have developed extensions for the CONSORT and STROBE Statements that can help improve the quality of reporting for SBR (

Indexed as

ExtensionHealth careReporting guidelinesResearchSimulation

Identifiers

PMID29449994
PMCPMC5806464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.