Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29449960›Full record

ArticleNPJ aging and mechanisms of disease2018

Physician-initiated clinical study of limb ulcers treated with a functional peptide, SR-0379: from discovery to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Hironori Nakagami, Ken Sugimoto, Takahiro Ishikawa, Taku Fujimoto, Toshifumi Yamaoka, Misa Hayashi, Eiji Kiyohara, Hiroshi Ando, Yuta Terabe, Yoichi Takami and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ aging and mechanisms of disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Hironori Nakagami1Department of Health Development and Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4494-3601
Ken Sugimoto2Department of Geriatric and General Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takahiro Ishikawa3Department of Clinical Cell Biology and Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Taku Fujimoto2Department of Geriatric and General Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Toshifumi Yamaoka4Department of Dermatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Misa Hayashi4Department of Dermatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9383-6979
Eiji Kiyohara4Department of Dermatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0436-4296
Hiroshi AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Kasukabe Chuo General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Yuta TerabePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Nishi Tokushukai Hospital, Nishi-tokyo, Japan.
Yoichi Takami1Department of Health Development and Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Koichi Yamamoto1Department of Health Development and Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yasushi Takeya1Department of Health Development and Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Minoru Takemoto7Department of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Japan.
Masaya Koshizaka1Department of Health Development and Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Tamotsu Ebihara8Department of Dermatology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayumi Nakamura9Department of Pharmacy, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Mitsunori Nishikawa9Department of Pharmacy, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Xiang Jing Yao10Department of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Hideki Hanaoka11Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Ichiro Katayama1Department of Health Development and Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Koutaro Yokote1Department of Health Development and Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Hiromi Rakugi1Department of Health Development and Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Osaka Gakuin University · JPOsaka University Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JPChiba University · JPChiba University Hospital · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPKeio University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPYokufukai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SR-0379 is a functional peptide that has wound healing effect with anti-microbial action, making it an ideal drug to prevent infection. To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of SR-0379 for the treatment of leg ulcers, a physician-initiated, phase I/IIa, first-in-patient clinical study was designed. A multi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical study was conducted from October 2015 to September 2016. The inclusion criteria for leg ulcers were (1) diabetes or critical limb ischemia and (2) wound size <6 cm in diameter. Twelve patients were randomized into four groups and administered 0.02%, 0.1%, or 0.5% SR-0379 or placebo treatment on skin ulcers once per day for 28 days. Efficiency was evaluated by determining the rate of wound size reduction as a primary endpoint at 4 weeks after the first treatment compared with the pre-treatment wound size. As a secondary endpoint, the DESIGN-R score index, time to wound closure, and the 50% wound size reduction ratio were also evaluated. The safety of SR-0379 was evaluated during the study period. In the evaluation of efficiency, the skin ulcer reduction rates at the last evaluation were 44.73% for the 0.02% SR-0379 group, 68.25% for the 0.1% group, and 71.61% for the 0.5% group, compared with 9.95% for the placebo group. Six adverse events were reported in four patients, of which one occurred in the placebo group, and causal relationships to study drugs were denied for all six events. Treatment with SR-0379 for chronic leg ulcers was safe, well tolerated, and effective.

Identifiers

PMID29449960
PMCPMC5809414
OpenAlexW2806992983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.