ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2018
Innovative approaches to genome editing in avian species.
Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Efficient and Safe Knockout ofVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Improvement of chicken genome editing efficiency in vitro using ribonucleoprotein-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Analysis of Transcriptome and Differentially Expressed Genes in Chicken Primordial Germ Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Advances in Genomics and Postgenomics in Poultry Science: Current Achievements and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Propagation of goose primordial germ cells in vitro relies on FGF and BMP signalling pathways.Communications biology · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-based programmable genome editing in chickens: concepts, applications and regulatory issues.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Birds: Opportunities and Challenges for Science and Agriculture.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- Beyond genes-for-behaviour: The potential for genomics to resolve long-standing questions in avian brood parasitism.Ecology and evolution · 2024Review
- Overview of Avian Sex Reversal.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- ATAC-seq and RNA-seq analysis unravel the mechanism of sex differentiation and infertility in sex reversal chicken.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2023Article
- Genomic trajectories of a near-extinction event in the Chatham Island black robin.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Quantitative analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated provirus deletion in blue egg layer chicken PGCs by digital PCR.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Harnessing Intronic microRNA Structures to Improve Tolerance and Expression of shRNAs in Animal Cells.Methods and protocols · 2022Article
- Article
- Recent Advances in the Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing System in Poultry Species.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Current Approaches and Applications in Avian Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Transgenesis and web resources in quail.eLife · 2020Article
- Efficient knock-in at the chicken ovalbumin locus using adenovirus as a CRISPR/Cas9 delivery system.3 Biotech · 2019Article
- Agricultural applications of genome editing in farmed animals.Transgenic research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tools available for genome engineering have significantly improved over the last 5 years, allowing scientist to make precise edits to the genome. Along with the development of these new genome editing tools has come advancements in technologies used to deliver them. In mammals genome engineering tools are typically delivered into in vitro fertilized single cell embryos which are subsequently cultured and then implanted into a recipient animal. In avian species this is not possible, so other methods have been developed for genome engineering in birds. The most common involves in vitro culturing of primordial germ cells (PGCs), which are cells that migrate through the embryonic circulatory system to the developing gonad and colonize the gonad, eventually differentiating into the gonadocytes which produce either sperm or ova. While in culture the PGCs can be modified to carry novel transgenes or gene edits, the population can be screened and enriched, and then transferred into a recipient embryo. The largest drawback of PGC culture is that culture methods do not transfer well across avian species, thus there are reliable culture methods for only a few species including the chicken. Two newer technologies that appear to be more easily adapted in a wider range of avian species are direct injection and sperm transfection assisted gene editing (STAGE). The direct injection method involves injecting genome engineering tools into the circulatory system of the developing embryo just prior to the developmental time point when the PGCs are migrating to the gonads. The genome engineering tools are complexed with transfection reagents, allowing for in vivo transfection of the PGCs. STAGE utilizes sperm transfection to deliver genome engineering tools directly to the newly fertilized embryo. Preliminary evidence indicates that both methodologies have the potential to be adapted for use in birds species other than the chicken, however further work is needed in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.