Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29449789›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2018

Factors associated with prescribing costs: analysis of a nationwide administrative database.

O Hirsch, M Schulz, M Erhart, N Donner-Banzhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

O Hirsch1Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4496-2554
M SchulzCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (ZI), Herbert-Lewin-Platz 3, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
M ErhartCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (ZI), Herbert-Lewin-Platz 3, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
N Donner-Banzhoff1Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAll health care systems in the world struggle with rising costs for drugs. We sought to explore factors impacting on prescribing costs in a nationwide database of ambulatory care in Germany. Factors identified by this research can be used for adjustment in future profiling efforts.

methodsWe analysed nationwide prescription data of physicians having contractual relationships with statutory health insurance funds in 2014. Predictor and outcome variables were aggregated at the practice level. We performed analyses separately for primary care and specialties of cardiology, gastroenterology, neurology and psychiatry, pulmology as well as oncology and haematology. Bivariate robust regressions and Spearman rank correlations were computed in order to find meaningful predictors for our outcome variable prescription costs per patient.

resultsMedian age of patients and proportion of DDD issued were substantial predictors for prescription costs per patient in Primary Care, Cardiology, and Pulmology with explained variances between 41 and 61%. In Neurology and Psychiatry only proportion of patients with polypharmacy ≥ 2 quarters was a significant predictor for prescription costs per patient, explaining 20% of the variance. For gastroenterologists, oncologists and haematologists no stable models could be established.

conclusionsAny analysis of prescribing behaviour must take the degree into account to which an individual physician or practice is responsible for prescribing patients' medication. Proportion of prescriptions/DDDs is an essential confounder for future studies of drug prescribing.

Indexed as

Ambulatory careDrug costsDrug prescriptionsRegression analyses

Identifiers

PMID29449789
PMCPMC5806480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.