Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29449786›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2018

Impact of the introduction of an endotracheal tube attachment device on the incidence and severity of oral pressure injuries in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study.

Jaye Hampson, Cameron Green, Joanne Stewart, Lauren Armitstead, Gemma Degan, Andrea Aubrey, Eldho Paul, Ravindranath Tiruvoipati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaye Hampson1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston Hospital, 2 Hastings road, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia.
Cameron Green1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston Hospital, 2 Hastings road, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia.
Joanne Stewart1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston Hospital, 2 Hastings road, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia.
Lauren Armitstead1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston Hospital, 2 Hastings road, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia.
Gemma Degan1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston Hospital, 2 Hastings road, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia.
Andrea Aubrey1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston Hospital, 2 Hastings road, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia.
Eldho Paul2Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC Australia.
Ravindranath Tiruvoipati1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston Hospital, 2 Hastings road, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia.
Frankston Hospital · AUPeninsula Health · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndotracheal tube (ETT) fasteners such as the AnchorFast™ claim to assist with the prevention of oral pressure injuries in intubated patients, however evidence to support their clinical efficacy is limited. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the impact of the introduction of the AnchorFast™ device on the incidence of oral pressure injuries in mechanically ventilated patients.

methodsData was collected from patient case notes and clinical incident reports for October 2010 to June 2013 (

resultsIncidence of oral pressure injuries increased from 1.53/100 intubated patients in the pre-AnchorFast period to 3.73/100 intubated patients in the post-AnchorFast period (IRR = 2.43, 95%CI = 1.35-4.38;

conclusionsThe incidence of oral pressure injuries increased significantly following the introduction of the AnchorFast™ device. Further research is required to establish the reasons for this observed increase to and identify ways to reduce the risk of pressure injuries with ETT securement devices.

Indexed as

AnchorFastCritical careEndotracheal intubationPressure injuryPressure wound

Identifiers

PMID29449786
PMCPMC5806388
OpenAlexW2795625675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.